Me! A disgraced celebrity! Starting by seeking justice for impoverished students.

As soon as Jiang Chen finished speaking, the viewers in the live stream chat exploded again.

【Holy crap! Please find the legal behavior for this sentence!】

[Attorney Jiang, it's one thing to let someone ride an old lady across the street, but why did they have to run a red light!]

[What the hell... are you saying running a red light is the most serious offense?]

[Has anyone spoken out for the elderly woman in the body?]

[Upstairs, that's not something a human being should say.]

To be frank, this definitely constitutes suspected murder, right? Because of running a red light!

[Forget about running a red light, what if this person is a conman? Carrying him on your back would be tantamount to intentional homicide!]

[Alright, alright, starting with a meteorite crash from Mount Tai, huh? That's impressive!]

Option C: Zhang San made vegetarians eat vegetarians.

Jiang Chen's expression remained unchanged as he slowly spoke.

This question is also the answer to another question.

How can we get vegetarians to eat meat?

Then let them eat people in a vegetative state!

That should make perfect sense, right?

"Finally, option D, Li Si tricked the cosplayer into cosplaying as a speed bump on the national highway."

If you put these four options out there, probably only a genius could choose the correct one.

By this time, netizens had already let it go.

That's how it should be!

I can't choose, because I think they're all inhuman!

As we all know, people can't imagine things that haven't happened. The fact that this kind of problem can arise means it must have actually occurred in reality!

Wow, that's terrifying to think about!

[After hearing the last three options, I now think tying ten knots in the apron of a one-armed elderly person is acceptable.]

I've learned something new: the best way to get people to accept you isn't to improve yourself, but to lower your standards!

[You've learned something from this too.]

So which of these four answers should we choose?

Jiang Chen wasn't in a hurry; instead, he looked at the screen with a smile.

"You can guess the answer to this question."

"If you can't guess, I'll explain it to you."

Viewers in the live stream immediately started discussing it.

Some people think it's B, since Li Si rode an old lady across the road against a red light, which could very likely lead to a car accident!

If Li Si were young, he would be fine, but the old lady is already quite old. What would happen if she were in a car accident?

Others think it's C.

If Zhang San makes vegetarians eat vegetarians, isn't that murder?

Moreover, this behavior involves very serious moral issues!

However, most people think that D is the correct answer.

Sending cosplayers to cosplay speed bumps on a national highway is a death sentence!

One second he's cosplaying as a speed bump, the next he hits the jackpot and opens a portal to another world.

Enjoy the benefits on the spot.

What else could this be but intentional homicide?

As for option A, it was almost completely ignored.

Netizens are arguing fiercely over the three options B, C, and D, and some even suspect that the question is a multiple-choice question.

Jiang Chen smiled and shook his head: "This is a single-choice question with only one answer, not a multiple-choice question."

His words only fueled the fire, making the online discussion even more intense.

[Definitely a B, the guy riding that old lady is definitely a novice!]

I agree. Running a red light and getting hit by a car and killed is tantamount to intentional homicide!

I think C has a valid point. Isn't it illegal to eat a person in a vegetative state?

[Yes, a person in a vegetative state is still a person. Eating them is illegal; it's intentional homicide!]

[What about option D? Tricking people into cosplaying as speed bumps on the national highway is tantamount to tricking them into dying!]

All I can say is, when you're facing a speed bump and the Universiade is only 0.01 centimeters away, I can't think of any way to survive except by blurring out the image.

[666, even the blurring dog is here!]

【…】

Seeing the discussions among netizens, Jiang Chen sighed helplessly.

"Sigh... I originally thought that the legal education I've been doing lately has been very effective, but I didn't expect that people's legal awareness is still somewhat weak."

"The answer to this question should be A. If Zhang San ties an apron for a one-armed old man with ten knots that are impossible to untie, this behavior may constitute intentional homicide."

Jiang Chen gave the answer directly.

Contrary to what the viewers in the live stream were discussing, they chose option A, which was almost universally ignored!

This has completely blown the internet up!

【ah?????】

"Wait, dude, you can choose A for this question!"

Why? Tying a knot that's impossible for an elderly person with one arm—is this really that serious?

[I don't understand, Attorney Jiang, you need to give me a reasonable explanation!]

Why not one of the other three options? Are the other three options all correct?

"That's definitely not it, that question is way too weird!"

I never would have guessed that A was the correct answer!

[I understand. Applying itching powder to an armless elderly person's body is also suspected of intentional homicide!]

Don't be honest, if someone actually did something like that, I'd really want to kill them!

It's alright, killing this kind of person is considered doing a service to the people, it's not illegal!

Jiang Chen coughed lightly, drawing the attention of netizens to himself.

"Everyone, the key point tested in this question is the core of the crime of intentional homicide."

"Let me explain to everyone that the core of intentional homicide lies in the subjective intent to kill and the objective act posing a danger of causing death!"

"Option A, where Zhang San tied ten knots in an apron for the one-armed elderly man, could constitute intentional homicide, which falls under the category of indirect intent!"

Almost no one in the live stream understood this logic.

Jiang Chen remained calm and explained to them.

"Let me give you a case analysis. This old man only has one arm and cannot untie the ten knots on his apron with one hand."

"If an apron is wrapped around the neck and gets knotted, there is a real danger of strangulation and suffocation!"

"Zhang Sanming knew that the one-armed elderly man was unable to untie the apron himself, and that the apron could strangle him and cause him to suffocate, but he still carried out the act."

"This shows that Zhang San was aware that the elderly person's death was possible, and allowed the death to occur, which constitutes indirect intent!"

"Objectively, the behavior created an extremely high risk to life."

"If the elderly man does indeed die from suffocation, then Zhang San will be guilty of intentional homicide!"

"Even if the victim doesn't die, attempted murder can still be established!"

Although Jiang Chen had explained it very clearly, the viewers in the live stream were still not convinced.

[Okay, okay, Attorney Jiang makes a good point. What about the others? Did they not involve intentional homicide?]

[Definitely not, this is absolutely illegal!]

I understand. Although it's illegal, it's not intentional homicide, but some other crime!

The law is so convoluted, it's outrageous!

"What were the other crimes, Attorney Jiang? I need a reasonable explanation!"