Me! A disgraced celebrity! Starting by seeking justice for impoverished students.

The court questioning session has now concluded.

After several rounds of questioning, the basic facts of the case have been recorded.

In particular, Jiang Chen's targeted questions were precise and crucial in every detail.

This completely overturned the established logic of "the defendant's operational error and negligent injury" constructed by Ye Heng.

The presiding judge proceeded with the process in accordance with regulations and began to address any omissions or deficiencies in the details of the case.

"Defendant Dong Xin, are the specific times of the incident—the exact moments of the vehicle collision, the time the parties involved called the police, and the time of the emergency medical assistance call—accurate?"

"Do the location where the victim fell and the final parking position of the vehicle match the on-site records?"

"Was there any interruption or delay in the entire process of the defendant avoiding, stopping, and providing assistance?"

"..."

Faced with the presiding judge's rigorous questioning, Dong Xin answered fluently throughout the entire process.

All time points and behavioral details correspond one-to-one.

He is a senior executive in the company and has a high level of education.

For some technical answers, Jiang Chen only needs to communicate with him in advance, and he can cooperate!

Every answer Dong Xin gave perfectly matched the evidence, including the surveillance footage.

It has almost completely plugged all the flaws and loopholes that could be nitpicked.

Just from the sheer detail of the case, it's clear that Jiang Chen's pre-trial preparations were incredibly meticulous!

The atmosphere in the live stream room became increasingly lively.

[It's so perfect! All the timelines match up perfectly, there's absolutely no flaw!]

Details determine success or failure; mastering every detail is true professionalism!

[This also requires a cooperative person involved. Isn't he a senior executive? He's highly educated, so he must be very intelligent!]

[Tsk tsk tsk... At this rate, there might actually be an opportunity for legitimate self-defense!]

After all the key evidence had been verified, the presiding judge spoke in a deep voice.

"The court has completed its factual investigation and questioning; the case now proceeds to the stage of presenting and examining evidence."

"According to the court rules, the plaintiff shall first present the evidence for conviction, and the defendant shall then cross-examine and defend against the evidence one by one."

The words fell.

Ye Heng, sitting in the plaintiff's seat, took a deep breath, his expression serious and earnest.

During the questioning, he was at a disadvantage and was suppressed at every turn.

Now that it's time to present evidence, it's his crucial opportunity to crush the other side!

Evidence is king!

Once irrefutable evidence is presented, even the most eloquent words will be of no use.

Ye Heng stood up, holding a thick stack of case files.

"Presiding Judge, Judges, we will now present our first set of core evidence for conviction."

"Firstly, the victim's complete autopsy report!"

He handed the paper report to the bailiffs.

"The autopsy clearly states that the deceased was hit by a motor vehicle, resulting in multiple internal organ contusions and lacerations, causing traumatic massive bleeding, and ultimately died despite all efforts to save him."

"The fatal injuries were caused by a vehicle collision; the damage was direct!"

"Secondly, the initial interrogation record from the police station."

"During the first interrogation by the police, the defendant Dong Xin confessed that he was the one who hit the victim with his vehicle, and he fully acknowledged the fact of the collision without any objection!"

"Thirdly, panoramic photos of the crime scene and actual photos of the damaged vehicles involved."

"The evidence from the scene, the dent in the vehicle, and the degree of force all corroborate that the impact was extremely powerful, directly causing the victim's fatal injuries!"

He submitted three sets of evidence in a row.

Ye Heng spoke each word with a firm and resolute tone, his gaze unwavering.

"In conclusion, all our evidence is sufficient to prove that the defendant clearly committed an act of driving a vehicle into the victim, objectively causing the serious consequence of the victim's death!"

"The act and the result correspond perfectly; the facts are clear and the evidence is conclusive. This fully meets the complete elements of the crime of negligent homicide and should be punished according to law!"

This argument is based on simple and straightforward logic, directly concluding that the murderer is Dong Xin!

Regardless of the cause of the dispute or past conflicts between the two parties.

If you hit someone and that person dies because of you, you should be guilty!

At this point, the viewers in the live stream fell silent.

[It must be said that the plaintiff's evidence is very solid, seemingly irrefutable!]

The impact was real, and the deaths were real; this is irrefutable evidence!

[In most cases, this stage is the end of the matter; it all depends on how Attorney Jiang breaks the deadlock!]

[In a typical traffic accident case, this would be irrefutable evidence!]

Ye Heng looked at Jiang Chen with a hint of smugness and provocation in his eyes.

He would like to see.

Faced with irrefutable written evidence, how can Jiang Chen possibly argue his way out of this situation?

The next second, Jiang Chen slowly stood up and faced the judge's bench.

"Your Honor, we have no objection to the authenticity and legality of the plaintiff's three sets of evidence."

His very first sentence stunned many people.

No objection to the authenticity and legality of the evidence?

Wouldn't that just declare the plaintiff, Dong Xin, to be the murderer?

Of course, it's not that simple.

Jiang Chen changed the subject.

"but!"

"We do not accept any of the evidence presented by the plaintiff's representative regarding its purpose or causal relationship!"

Jiang Chen does not deny the facts, but only dissects the logic behind the conviction.

This is the most professional and precise method of verification!

Jiang Chen remained calm and began to argue his points.

"First, regarding the causal determination in the autopsy report."

"The report clearly states that the victim suffered multiple internal organ contusions and lacerations, but did not die on the spot."

"The victim was taken to the hospital for treatment about an hour after the collision, but was pronounced dead despite all efforts to save him."

"In the determination of causation under criminal law, there is a clear factor of medical intervention in this case."

"The defendant's act of striking the victim only resulted in serious injury, not direct death!"

"The victim's eventual death was caused by a combination of factors, including the subsequent treatment process and the continued deterioration of his condition!"

Jiang Chen's angle is quite unique.

Clues were found in the autopsy report.

It is evidence against Ye Heng, and also evidence against Jiang Chen!

"This means that the direct causal relationship under criminal law between the initial collision and the final death has been severed!"

Jiang Chen said seriously.

"The victim's death cannot be entirely attributed to our client's actions in taking necessary precautions!"

This output precisely pinpointed the core loophole in the case!

Dong Xin's car hitting the victim was not directly causally related to the victim's death!

That's exactly what Jiang Chen wanted to explain.

Jiang Chen then continued to refute.

"Secondly, the allegations of operational errors and improper handling by the defendant are completely unfounded!"

"The crime scene was a confined and narrow underground parking garage passage in the residential complex, where the space for passage in front and behind was extremely limited."

"At the time of the incident, the passageway was completely blocked by three intoxicated individuals, leaving no room for vehicles to avoid, reverse, or back up!"

"Given that our client had nowhere to retreat and his wife and children were subjected to continuous physical threats, his decision to make slow, minor adjustments to his direction to avoid danger was the only legal and reasonable option for self-rescue!"

"Our client acted out of a desperate situation and there was no operational error or mishandling involved!"