God's imitator

Chapter 168 Plan
In addition to these, there are many other unexpected situations.

For example, after a resolution to grant unconditional salvation is made, what if a player enters the game feeling reckless and deliberately courts death for personal gain, causing the salvation ticket to be wasted meaninglessly?
It's clearly wrong for the more reckless people to be given priority access to immunity from punishment.

However, if a vote were to be held every time, it would obviously be too late.

To put it bluntly, "when should a 'immunity ticket' be used" is a dynamic question with too many influencing factors to be strictly constrained by rules of procedure; it can only be left to human subjective judgment.

Xu Tong was the first to suggest, "How about we form a queue based on the amount of money spent on purchasing this voucher?"
"For example, if two players want to use it at the same time, the one who contributed more money will have priority."

“Once a player has used up their ticket, they must make up the difference of 30 from the luxury goods fund before they can continue to queue up.”

Li Renshu shook her head: "No, because the situation where 'two players need the Immunity Ticket at the same time' is extremely rare."

"If both situations occur simultaneously, we should directly rescue the one who has made the greater contribution, and no one will object."

"But if two players encounter danger one after the other, your queuing plan won't be very effective, and the key to this problem isn't actually the visa time."

Yang Yuting tentatively asked, "Then how about we set a threshold, such as requiring a certain percentage of investment to qualify for the use of the 'immunity ticket'?"

Cai Zhiyuan also said: "In fact, many online games have a mechanism similar to 'auction' for such precious items."

“We could also consider holding an auction within the community, with the highest bidder winning, and then redistributing the proceeds to the disadvantaged within the community.”

"In this way, even if the strong keep holding onto the immunity ticket without using it, they have at least paid a lot of time for visa processing, so the weak are not entirely without any gain."

Lin Sizhi was silent for a moment, then said, "However, online games that adopt a similar 'gold farming group' model have also encountered a very serious problem."

"The environment will soon become very hostile and intolerant of newcomers. Most people will start to worry about their own gains and losses. Players in the same team will no longer be partners who can trust each other unconditionally, but will become purely colleagues."

"Mistakes will result in fines, lateness will result in fines, and even close brothers must be accountable. There are countless cases where people have fallen out over an auction."

"The 'immunity ticket' is more valuable than rare items in the game, and its impact is naturally greater."

"If everyone wants the 17th community to become like that, then we can consider this plan."

Lee In-sook glanced at everyone and silently shook her head.

Clearly, the two proposals put forward by Yang Yuting and Cai Zhiyuan share a common problem, making it difficult to reach a consensus within the community.

The problem is that this way of using it seriously violates the underlying values ​​of Community 17.

Yang Yuting's method is definitely not going to work. Cai Zhiyuan's method is slightly better, but it will also create significant hidden dangers.

The existence and use of "immunity from death" vouchers are themselves part of "community welfare".

In other words, the "immunity ticket" should not be viewed simply as "an ordinary commodity purchased by the strong for 30." Its existence is itself a result of "community building."

Community building includes political activities, proposals and system development within the community, social relationships among players, and personnel structure adjustments made to optimize diversity and knowledge structure, among other things.

All of this was accomplished by all members of the community.

Just as every player has an equal vote on every proposal, the "immunity ticket" is a special item that is part of the community benefits, and every player should also have a share of the right to use it.

Using investment thresholds to qualify for use, or converting immunity tickets into a player's private property through auctions, can effectively create a situation where the strong oppress the weak.

When the weak are dissatisfied, they will unite and use proposals to teach the strong a lesson. Under the system of one vote per person, the strong cannot do whatever they want.

Moreover, from its inception, Community 17 has not been a system that favors the vulnerable; it has always advocated for the protection, inclusion, and diversity of the vulnerable.

If the use of this coupon seriously violates the previous principles, the hard-won stability may collapse instantly.

The "immunity from death" voucher must be used as much as possible.

The right of the vulnerable to use should not be deprived directly or indirectly in any way.

Those who invest more can gain certain advantages, but these advantages must be limited.

There must never be a situation where "a strong person seizes a life-saving ticket and refuses to let others use it, even when there is no danger to their own life."

Wang Yongxin breathed a sigh of relief: "In the end, there is only one best way to use this coupon."

“We will select someone and authorize him to take control of this immunity certificate.”

"When it is necessary to use it, he will make the decision himself."

"If we are not satisfied with his decision, we will replace him with someone else next time."

Wang Yongxin was actually reluctant to propose this plan because he knew that even if the plan were adopted, the person chosen to control the immunity certificate would definitely not be himself.

But there was nothing he could do, because this was the inevitable conclusion everyone would reach after the discussion, and there was no way to stop it.

More importantly, if we don't choose this option, but instead choose other options, such as: mandating that a certain group of people have priority in using the death-exemption certificate, or unconditionally giving the death-exemption certificate to the first person at risk of death, or having one person pay for the death-exemption certificate and then share the money with others...

That could very well lead to something even worse.

The weak are likely to crave this immunity ticket more than the strong, and according to the principle of the happy ones yielding, the strong must make some concessions appropriately, which is unavoidable.

As long as everyone is still in the same community and each person still has one vote, everyone's opinion must be taken into account.

Lin Sizhi added a crucial question: "So, regarding the use of this voucher, should a certain group of people be granted a 'veto right'?"

"Alternatively, we can grant multiple people both the 'right to use' and the 'veto right' at the same time."

"For example, if one of the three people agrees, the coupon can be used."

"Or, if any one of the three people explicitly disagrees, the coupon cannot be used."

Everyone fell silent again; clearly, the problem was becoming increasingly complicated.

After careful consideration, Cai Zhiyuan said, "How about this, I'll propose a plan, and everyone can consider whether it's suitable."

"One person has the right to use the device, while two others have the right to veto it."

“I don’t think it’s a good idea for multiple people to have the right to use it. In that case, those who tend to ‘actively use the get-out-of-jail-free card’ will actually gain more power, and there will be a tendency for the use of the get-out-of-jail-free card to be too casual.”

(End of this chapter)