God's imitator

The controversy surrounding the use of Chapter 167

Everyone read the description of the "immunity ticket" several times, and they could hardly believe their eyes.

"They actually sell this kind of thing? That's unbelievable!" Xu Tong exclaimed.

Jiang He was very pleased: "It seems that our enthusiastic donation to the public fund was the right choice! This item won't appear if it doesn't exceed 30."

Fu Chen nodded: "That's right, those communities that believe in Socialism will never activate this product."

This unexpected joy made everyone very happy.

The specific usage of this item is clearly explained from its description.

A pardon must be used before being sentenced to immediate death and cannot revive someone who is already dead.

However, its usage conditions are not particularly demanding and do not require any prior prediction.

Once a player purchases a "no-death ticket," any player in the community who enters the game and is deemed by the game's arcade to be at high risk of death will have their situation broadcast live on the community's large screen.

This live stream was unprecedented and can be considered a special benefit for the community and players who purchased the "immunity ticket".

This avoids the awkward situation where "the person with the immunity ticket is not in the game".

Moreover, the "immunity ticket" can be used by anyone in this community, and its use will most likely ensure the player's safe return from the game.

After all, judging from the current situation, the game time will not exceed 24 hours, and it is unlikely that players will suffer two different instant death penalties in the game.

Of course, something as powerful as this will also have various hard and soft limitations.

First, purchases must be made using community public funds, and the purchase amount must reach 30 before the item will be displayed.

If the community only deducts from the minimum living allowance, it will never accumulate 30 in public funds, and this entry will never be activated.

Secondly, 30 visa time is not a small amount, let alone 30 of non-private property.

Finally, the "immunity ticket" will only enter a 30-day cooldown period after it is used up. In other words, you cannot use one ticket and immediately buy another to use it, or save two people in a row.

A one-month cooldown period is enough for at least four games to run. If there are large-scale deaths, this ticket can only save one key character at most.

These are the hard limitations, but in reality, there are also many soft limitations.

For example, after this voucher is purchased, who decides when to use it? If multiple people need to be exempt from death, who should receive it? If it's decided by vote, how many votes are needed for it to be used? What if there isn't enough time to vote?
This thing is so valuable and so rare that its control and use will become major problems.

Lee In-sook's expression was somewhat serious: "It seems we need to have a proper discussion about how to use this thing."

As for whether or not to buy it, no one would offer any other opinion.

I will definitely buy it, without a doubt.

In the real world, how much money can buy a chance to avoid death? No amount of money can buy it.

In the new world, the community is willing to sell a player a "get out of death" ticket for only 30 visa time, which is already considered extremely merciful.

No matter how expensive this thing is, even if it's astronomically expensive, players will still try every means to buy it, because it's much more cost-effective than buying luxury goods.

Fu Chen asked, "Shouldn't we come up with a proposal on how to specifically use the death-exemption certificate?"

Others agreed.

It is entirely appropriate to issue a separate bill to regulate something so important.

But Cai Zhiyuan shook his head: "It's not that simple. It's absolutely impossible to satisfy everyone's needs regarding 'how to specifically use the death exemption certificate' with a single proposal."

"Let's go back to the long table and discuss this in detail."

Everyone returned to the long table and sat down.

Lee In-sook said first: "It is certainly no problem to put forward a proposal on the use of the death exemption certificate and stipulate the specific usage method."

"But as Cai Zhiyuan said, this proposal cannot satisfy everyone."

"Because such a proposal simply falls into two categories:"
"The first type is very detailed and absolutely mandatory."

"For example, we agreed in the proposal that as long as the conditions are met, the 'immunity certificate' will be used automatically."

"The specific conditions could be as follows: for any player in the community with more than 20 remaining visa time, if they face a risk of death in the trial game, an automatic immunity ticket would be used on them."

"I'm just giving an example; the specific conditions can change."

"While such a proposal could certainly ensure that the 'immunity from death' policy would be used as we expect, the problem is that the content of such a proposal would be completely inflexible. Can we reach a consensus on this issue?"

Everyone fell into silence.

Everyone naturally wants to use the "immunity ticket" on themselves.

If the candidates for the "immunity ticket" could be selected, everyone would definitely want to select those who are in their own best interest.

For example, the weaker party may feel that they have a higher risk of death in the game and should be taken care of.

The strongman felt that he had already contributed so much visa time to the community, and he had paid for most of the money to buy the death benefit, so shouldn't he have priority to use it?

It's very difficult for 12 people to reach a consensus on this issue.

Even if they manage to get 7 votes, the remaining 5 people will definitely be extremely dissatisfied.

Unlike the division of power, which can at least be divided to some extent, the death-exemption ticket is a single ticket that cannot be divided at all.

Lee In-sook continued, "The second scenario is that there are no screening criteria. The bill stipulates that anyone in the community who is at risk of death will be saved with a 'immunity certificate'."

"This might gain the approval of the majority, but it will also create new problems."

Everyone remained silent.

Anyone who is even slightly intelligent quickly figured out the problem.

The idea of ​​"whoever dies first gets to use it" seems fair at first glance, since no one would intentionally seek death to use the coupon. However, upon closer examination, it's full of problems.

For example, players have different levels of importance in the community. Strong players have a low death rate in the game, but that doesn't mean they will never fail.

Strong players like Lin Sizhi and Wang Yongxin can continuously contribute visa time to the community as long as they live. If they were to die in the game and not be saved by the invulnerability voucher, it would be an immeasurable loss for the entire 17th community.

If you save whoever dies first, you might end up saving someone who contributes little to the community and isn't that important, while the truly important person might run out of coupons when they fail.

But if we only save the strong? That doesn't quite make sense either.

Since a strong person might survive for several months, should we just leave this coupon there?
As long as the strong character can survive for a month after the previous coupon is used, they can hold out until the next coupon is refreshed.

In this situation, it is more worthwhile to save the vulnerable, because the visa time can be earned back. However, the death of a vulnerable person who is in line with the community's ecosystem will also affect the stability of the community.

　I lost track of time while revising the story. I'll resume three updates a day starting tomorrow. Please vote with your monthly tickets!
　　
　
(End of this chapter)