New Age Artists

Chapter 298: Freedom Stigmatization, the Biggest Change (44)

Some interest groups are constantly trying to alienate ordinary families at Dongda University.

Create a specific group.

No brains, no self-awareness, and poor ability to resist risks.

Interest groups such as beauty, travel, medical beauty, micro-loans, and entertainment fan circles are having a blast.

This is not over yet.

There is a third problem with the original theme.

free.

The hero tells the heroine that it is important to make your own decision and you can still say goodbye.

When the heroine confided in her mother, she did not tell the truth.

The mother told the heroine to give it a try.

The heroine overturned her previous decision to stay in this time and space, and the reason she gave was that she wanted to give it a try.

If you give it a try, you won't be able to stand firm.

The mother said she would choose the father, so the heroine gave it a try.

That's not taking a chance, that's gambling.

It’s like online gambling, where others can adjust the winning rate, which is a scam for fools.

The ideas throughout the film reflect the original creators' narrow concept of freedom.

There is something wrong with freedom.

Shen Santong was not sure what freedom was.

But he can define a boundary as to what is and is not considered freedom.

First of all, free fall is not freedom.

Falling from the sky, you can shout and move freely, but this is not freedom.

My life is about to end, what freedom do I have?

Next, determine a boundary.

Ordinary people and bigwigs who control a large amount of social resources should not emphasize freedom, but equality and fairness.

In an environment of absolute freedom, billionaires have countless ways to kill ordinary people.

Shen Santong felt from the connotation of the original theme that some people were stigmatizing freedom.

In the name of freedom, some people are given privileges.

Trolley problem.

A very famous thought experiment, the content of which is roughly: a madman tied five innocent people to the tram tracks.

An out-of-control tram is heading towards them and will crush them in a moment.

Luckily, there's a lever you can pull to move the trolley onto another track.

The problem is, the madman has also tied up someone on another tram track.

Considering the above situation, should you pull the lever?

This question is a complete bullshit question.

It is a moral trap for ordinary people.

This type of question can be studied academically.

If this causes discussion in society, it will definitely be a very vicious plot.

First of all, it is a low-probability event for a person to run onto the track.

It is an extremely low probability event for a madman to kidnap people, let alone two groups of people.

Although Shen Santong is not a professional, he can think of several methods.

To solve railway accidents, what needs to be done is to strengthen the management of railway tracks and prevent people from going up them.

Even if it goes up, we can take it away immediately.

Even if they were not able to take it away, the train should have an emergency brake.

Then, targeting the lunatics, we will strengthen the management of mental hospitals and identify those responsible.

As long as these points are achieved, the probability of an event with low probability can be reduced to zero.

In other words, it won’t happen.

Here comes the point.

These solutions have nothing to do with ordinary people.

It targets tram operators and official departments.

And these two groups, in the United States and in the West, one represents the investors and decides whether to fund research on such issues.

The other is the rule-maker who decides whether research is legal.

In a irresponsible society, they will certainly not fund or allow research to strengthen their own supervision.

Throwing out moral dilemmas is essentially making ordinary people suffer and make choices.

The purpose of hyping up such topics is to focus attention on morality and individuals.

But they ignored the tram operator who should be held responsible and the party responsible for supervising the madman.

The relevant departments and operating companies, as larger organizations than individuals, possess a lot of resources, but they have remained invisible on this issue.

Instead, ordinary people are pushed forward and asked to make the decision as to who should be killed.

The most powerful thing about the various interest groups in the United States is that they are organizations that wield a lot of power, including government and corporate officials, and they are free from accountability.

Big actions cover up small actions.

In the name of freedom, they oppress and plunder ordinary people.

In general.

The theme of the original Happy Death Day 2 must be drastically changed.

The subject matter is very wrong.

Habitual values, allowing ordinary people to make choices in the name of freedom, actually dismembers families and encourages family conflicts and rifts.

In terms of specific plot design, the value is not convincing.

The reasons given are also unconvincing.

The heroine becomes unlovable, and the hero becomes unlovable too, and they are not worthy of the audience's love.

This problem did not exist in the first part, but it appeared in the second part.

Shen Santong believes that this phenomenon is essentially caused by the bankruptcy of American values.

The existence of a second part means that the first part was successful.

The creators and producers are preparing the second part with the attitude of making a big deal.

Bring it up with great effort, and make sure it's a big one.

Finally, a big one was pulled.

Not as good as the first one, it's not as good as the value.

The original film's creators have sided with the interest entities that control a large amount of resources.

It seems that the creators have lost touch with their proper stance and are consciously defending certain interest groups.

But it is hard to say whether these media groups have the ability to change people's fundamental stance.

Shen Santong felt that they did not have this ability.

It should be said that ordinary Americans, compared with other parts of the world, have interests that are consistent with those of their own country's interest groups.

To put it bluntly, ordinary Americans benefit from this system.

In the name of freedom, they engage in plundering; they shout about universal values, but in fact they burn the order of plundering.

Not only white leftists benefit, but rednecks too.

Only the white leftists admit this, while the rednecks refuse to acknowledge the benefits.

A homeless person can survive by eating welfare, where does the money come from?

It was plundered from all over the world.

At home, ordinary Americans are oppressed by interest groups.

But in the international community, ordinary Americans oppress more people, especially those in the third world. Therefore, ordinary people as the main creators are also consciously taking responsibility.

This kind of irresponsibility means that freedom is priceless and plunder is not a crime.

They messed up a lot of things, reaped the benefits, and didn't take any responsibility.

Because you can choose, you can give it a try.

It’s just that we in the United States have more planes and aircraft carriers, so we have more freedom.

If I ask again, it means I am confessing to God.

the result.

Internationally, the United States bullies other countries.

Therefore, it is natural for people with more resources in the United States to bully ordinary people.

The American middle class has been displaced and countless family structures have been broken, which is what they deserve.

It's your choice, Americans.

This is why the United States later fell into the situation of "the white snow is so clean".

Despite plundering so many resources from all over the world, public security in metropolitan areas like Chicago and Los Angeles is still so poor.

Because they have woven a theory to justify plundering.

This theory applies not only to external affairs, but also to internal affairs.

Culturally speaking, the United States has not yet solved a problem that the Chinese solved thousands of years ago.

That is, "Who am I, where am I from, and where am I going."

The American solution is to attribute it to faith.

The older Chinese have solved this problem in a down-to-earth manner, from both cultural and practical aspects.

During the Shang Dynasty, faith and governance were integrated, and politics and religion were united.

During the Zhou Dynasty, etiquette and laws were used to regulate people's behavior.

The result is that ordinary older Chinese people have a sense of sacrifice and dedication.

I don't want to live, it's meaningless, I fantasize about fighting criminals, saving a few people and dying heroically.

Many older Chinese have this idea.

The root of this idea is that this kind of death is considered "meaningful".

From family trees to local chronicles, to society and the country, everything will be remembered.

The reason why I want to die like this is because it doesn’t count as death, and I will still be alive in a spiritual way.

This is the benefit of solving the questions of “who am I, where do I come from, and where am I going?”

The United States has not solved it, but Angola is better off and can blame it on faith.

The Jews are even more terrible, they have no faith.

The Jews are completely irresponsible, never consider "where to go", and repeatedly go to the end of the road.

Therefore, in later generations, the Jews reached the same dead end that was repeated in history.

The small country built by their own ethnic group is about to be destroyed, and the United States will also be destroyed.

If the Jews hadn't messed around with the steering wheel, the United States wouldn't be in such a bad state.

At least attributing it to faith can solve some problems, but it also requires taking on certain responsibilities.

Continue shooting.

Shen Santong greeted Lv Zhong and Liang Guanhua: "Hello, Teacher Lv, Hello, Teacher Liang."

The two responded enthusiastically and were very happy.

The movie "Happy Birthday" broke the record in film history, and they are also proud of it.

Shen Santong’s modification of the theme is actually very simple.

These are issues of stance, not technicalities.

Just change your stance.

Just like the trolley problem, it should not be discussed at the public level at all.

It should not be used to embarrass ordinary people.

Choosing a mother or a boyfriend, such boring questions should not be discussed and brought up for the audience to see.

The male protagonist should not force values ​​on the female protagonist or preach to her, just have a normal discussion.

Show your lovely side.

The more this happened, the more uncomfortable the heroine felt.

Love cannot be obtained in this time and space.

Dislocated time and space.

This naturally leads the heroine to think about when she should stay.

When the heroine sees those photos, she doesn't feel strange, but curious.

Look at the relationship between you and your mother from another perspective.

After all, a daughter is the flesh and blood that falls from her mother's body.

It's the soul that has traveled across time and space, not the body that has changed. Mom is still mom.

As for having different preferences for food, that is even less likely.

China is not the United States, a food desert, so you have to buy food outside.

What you like to eat depends on your family’s taste.

Don’t the Chinese people love the taste of home?
Sometimes when Shen Santong listened to the opening credits of the News Alliance, he could smell the aroma of food.

It's not that I really smell it, but there was a period of time when I was a student. I always ate at this time, so when the news broadcast started, I always smelled the aroma of rice and coriander wafting out.

When the heroine has difficulty making a choice, she turns to her mother.

Open your heart to your mother and tell her about your experience.

Unlike the original version, in the first film, the mother wrote a letter.

When my mother heard that I had written a letter, she said with a little pride that it was something I could do.

The attitude towards family is not deconstruction, but construction.

It is not about promoting conflicts, but about eliminating barriers.

After hearing her daughter's experience, the mother had an expression that said, "I don't understand, but I'm shocked."

The mother's first reaction was to ask the heroine: "Without me, is your father having a hard time over there? Is he eating well? Has he lost weight?"

The heroine said: "It's still fat."

The heroine was caught off guard and ate a mouthful of dog food from her parents.

There are tears in laughter and laughter in tears, and the atmosphere is warm.

Choose boyfriend or mother, the mother’s answer shows that this is an extremely boring question.

You, the heroine, not only have a mother, you also have a father!

In this time and space, your father has a mother. If you don’t go back to that time and space, your father will not only lose your mother, but also you.

Moreover, when the heroine goes back, it may be that her soul travels through time and space, and the memory of her previous daughter will return.

There is no need to take a gamble, nor is there any emphasis on making your own choices.

It was a very warm and natural choice.

The heroine has sufficient motivation to return to her original time and space.

The heroine doesn't have to waste time on choosing between her beloved mother and the beloved hero.

Mom will let you go back to take care of Dad, and the problem will be solved perfectly.

Your mother is always your mother.

The theme of "Happy Death Day 2" was analyzed, and the social foundation of the United States was analyzed, and why the creators thought so.

Don’t say I’m bad, I finished writing it in just a few chapters. It was not easy after repeatedly reviewing the films and studying them.

I have indeed reached a bottleneck recently. My writing style is different from that of other entertainment writers. There is no CP, and it is not a humorous writing style, so it is a bit difficult to keep the word count.

I am learning how to write entertainment articles.



(End of this chapter)