New Age Artists

Chapter 297: Hollywood’s fake reflection: Who is promoting conflicts in the original family? (34)

The Chinese people are politically mature. Compared with the old Chinese, the Americans can only be said to be children.

Immature little brat.

In a country like the United States, the middle class has been halved compared to its peak. The reason why the data shows that it is only one-tenth less is because the standards are constantly being lowered. It's pure statistical magic.

Using the original standards, the purchasing power standard has been cut in half.

Damn, the redneck doesn't even dare to fart.

Choosing a billionaire like One Ear to represent yourself will not solve any problem.

If it were Tokyo University, it would have been done long ago.

The problem with the original theme is not just the male protagonist’s face.

After confronting the male protagonist, the female protagonist was worried about safety issues before the machine started, so she asked her mother to take her home.

Mom talked about her favorite meat rolls.

The heroine, who has no memories at all, gradually realizes that she is not her parents' real daughter.

She doesn't live in the world either.

At the hotel, the mother noticed that something was wrong with her daughter.

The heroine asked her mother, if you choose to be with your father, you will lose a loved one, what will you choose?
The mother will still choose the father. She tells the heroine that people always have to make choices, follow their hearts and give it a try.

The mother's answer made the heroine no longer feel conflicted.

Just as he finished speaking, the news reported that the male protagonist died in the hospital.

The balance in the heroine's heart shifted towards the hero.

Before the time machine started, it crashed into a substation.

When she wakes up from the last cycle, she says that she will save the hero for the last time, but in fact the corners of her mouth are raised, indicating that the heroine will choose to leave this time and space.

Before leaving, say goodbye to your mother.

The heroine doesn't want to live in the past and decides to give it a try.

The above is the theme of the original version, the character arc of the heroine and her mental transformation.

It can be said to be very bad.

First of all.

When the male and female protagonists confront each other, they force the value.

The original version is very annoying.

The male protagonist becomes unlovable and acts like a bitch.

The heroine also started to act pretentious and hypocritical.

Hollywood movies like to use values ​​to preach into people's minds, but the key is that after teaching them the values, people find that they have no value.

Especially during the epidemic, we discovered that the American elites have no morals at all.

No underwear at all.

This is a common problem in Hollywood.

Commercial films cannot be without some value, but if they really want to tell something profound, they are similar to domestic art film directors.

Objectively incapable.

Or they think they are the culprit, so they avoid it.

This is very obvious when discussing serious topics.

Such as the midlife crisis, reflections on freedom and war.

Some Hollywood movies about the Middle East war are full of crocodile tears.

"The Covenant", a classic movie about Afghanistan.

In fact, spending two trillion US dollars, enough to bury all the Afghans, is just a way to burn, kill and loot people's land.

In the end, a huge amount of money was spent and so many people died.

They would rather embezzle the money than repair their own domestic infrastructure.

So much money has been spent, but the lives of the soldiers who risked their lives are not guaranteed.

Think about it, the soldiers who worked hard for the empire were abandoned like dogs when they came back.

The empire would rather keep its money in unimportant places and distribute it to various allied contractors than care about the lives of the good people in your six towns.

This kind of reflection has some reflective flavor.

But it’s still not true reflection.

True reflection means looking in the mirror, talking about the sins we have committed, the suffering and bloodshed we have caused, and seeing what kind of harm we have caused to the local people.

But Hollywood didn't do that, nor did it dare to do so.

So, in fact, Hollywood has no reflection.

Not only do they not reflect on themselves, they also use movies like "The Covenant" to physically hurt others, and then use media hegemony to hurt them again mentally.

Tampering with memory.

Movies are just one part of it, there are also think tanks, academia, and news reports.

Most of the think tanks and academics who study Afghanistan write articles in English, and there are few reports written in the local language.

If the United States does not decline, or Afghanistan does not live up to expectations.

Years later, through movies like "The Covenant", I still thought that the American soldiers were going to bring warmth.

Reflection is not real reflection, but a programmed performance, similar to "I reflect on myself, so I can do something bad."

It’s better to say it’s a reflection than to whitewash oneself. A little criticism may actually help. Disclaimer.

Second.

The original version was released in 19, and it should have been filmed in 18.

From this movie, Shen Santong can feel that the family structure in the United States is disintegrating.

The heroine was facing such a big problem, but she was hiding something from her mother and was hesitant.

The mother's advice to her daughter was to give it a try.

A careful analysis reveals that there are huge problems here.

There are two aspects to the problem.

One is that children encounter problems, which are related to life choices.

Emphasizing privacy and hiding things at this time will cause greater difficulties.

Even irreversible damage to life.

Sometimes life experiences are similar, and parents may have encountered this pitfall before.

From a parent's perspective, another problem arises.

When children face problems, parents do not ask for the reasons.

On the surface, I had an opportunity to make a lot of money, but in reality it was small loans and online gambling.

Your parents told you to give it a try.

This is nonsense. It seems to be encouraging self-reliance, but isn't it just pushing people into a fire pit?

Of course, it can be said that this situation exists in reality, where poor communication between children and parents leads to bad consequences.

But as a movie, it is something man-made.

Why should a cultural product create division?

At least Shen Santong's films are about construction, not destruction.

This can be seen from the theme of the original version.

Some forces, through the tool of film, are encouraging the disintegration of family structures.

In other words, some forces are encouraging the white left group of Hollywood creators to break up families through movies.

This problem is not just in the United States.

The same thing also existed in the University of Tokyo in later generations.

Constantly emphasize the conflicts in the original family.

It’s not that there is no problem in a family, but why should we actively emphasize and advocate the division?

The reality is that it is difficult to have a 100% perfect family.

Parents would quarrel, have all kinds of minor problems, drink, play mahjong, or just have bad tempers.

As long as it's not too extreme, the kind that drinks every day and doesn't care about the family, or loses everything in gambling.

Or they may have mistresses outside or find other men, ruining their family.

After all, those who are particularly extreme are a minority.

Most families are just ordinary families, with some minor flaws, but still warm and cozy.

Family is not a simple collection of emotions.

Before a family is bound by blood or emotion, it is first and foremost a community of interests.

This model has existed for so many years because it is a practical necessity.

Men and women live together to hedge against risks, have children to avoid being bullied when they are old, or to find something to do and something to rely on when they are old.

A very realistic need.

The question is, what are the consequences of creating arguments about the original family and amplifying family frictions?
The consequence is that the elderly’s ability to resist risks is reduced, and the young’s ability to resist risks is reduced.

Ordinary people have no bargaining power.

To put it bluntly, the parties involved are definitely the ones who suffer the most from the separation of family members and the sowing of discord.

Who benefits?

It means that people outside the family benefit.

In the United States, yes.

By breaking up the family, some interest groups can do whatever they want.

Individuals themselves are very weak in front of organizations.

If even the family structure is broken down, then it will become atomic.

Take some beautiful girls and boys for example. They have a stable family structure and they have a tutor.

Dignity and integrity are priceless.

When there are problems with cash flow in normal times, the family can withstand the risks and will not resort to selling themselves or blood all of a sudden.

Without the protection of family, it is easy to turn beautiful men and women into playthings.

Because of creating conflicts in the original family, a very strange scene has emerged where some people spend their family’s money while hating their parents.

(End of this chapter)