Werewolf: Please start your show

[Player No. 4 please speak]

"I'm afraid of this kind of situation. The wolf spoke before me and pretended to be a bear tamer. What I fear is bound to happen."

Hearing this, the good man frowned immediately.

It is true that what you fear will come true.

In this board, good people are afraid of tough guys, and they are even more afraid of bears.

The so-called bear-back is a wolf and a bear tamer next to each other.

Standing on the side is already a headache for good people, but at least on the second day, they can use the information provided by the system to judge whether the one who was pushed out on the first day was the bear tamer or the tough wolf, so as not to always stand on the wrong side.

But the premise of this logic is that two bear trainers cannot be together.

This method doesn't work if there are two bear trainers together.

"Player No. 5 is a wolf, and we can't rule out the possibility of 3rd and 5th double wolves."

"This is a bit difficult. 5 is in the front position wearing my clothes and jumping. If I jump into the bear trainer position, you will think that I was forced to jump because of the check."

"The most important thing is that after I was eliminated, the bear stopped roaring, and you couldn't judge 5 as a tough wolf based on this information."

“Once the good guys are on the wrong side for two days in a row, the game is almost over.”

"To be honest, I don't know how to pull you back now. I can't use the police badge method, which is very uncomfortable."

"Player No. 6 must be a good guy, equivalent to the reverse gold. Player No. 5 is jumping here, actually he is going for the bear trainer behind the police."

"From this perspective, maybe there are multiple wolves behind the scenes, so I am very suspicious of the identity of Player 3. Maybe I am overthinking and Player 3 is a good person, but I still have to deal with it. There is no other way."

"I can't not play 3 and 3 double wolves just because I'm afraid of offending player 3, or causing hostility and resentment towards me. This logic line must be discussed."

"Player 3, if you are a good person, I hope you can be more tolerant and think from my perspective, so that we can understand each other and live in world harmony."

Gu Feng listened to Player No. 4's speech with a blank expression on his face.

He would not be disgusted with 4 or want to stand on his side just because 3 suspected 5 and 4 of being a pair of wolves.

It mainly depends on the logic and speech of player No. 4. Can they impress him and make him stand on the side of player No. 4? Otherwise, it is more likely that player No. 5 will become a bear tamer.

After all, 5 jumps first, and 4 jumps in the later position, which is equivalent to a pull-up jumper on the spot after receiving the check.

Most people feel troubled by this bear-back situation.

But Gu Feng thought it was okay, at least there would be fewer focus points.

From the perspective of a good guy with his eyes closed, just keep an eye on people 3, 4, 5, and 6.

If there is someone in the outside position and player No. 5 jumps to the bear tamer, then there are six focus positions, and the game will be even more difficult.

and so.

Whether it is a bear or not, there are pros and cons.

If it is a bear, the good guy loses the advantage of relying on the system to put the information in a correct perspective the next day.

But there are fewer focal points, which reduces the logical burden on the good guys. Judging the identities of four people is definitely much easier than judging the identities of six people, and the logical line is also relatively simpler.

If it wasn't the bear, the good guys could use the information provided by the system on the second day to determine whether the person voted out on the first day was a bear tamer or a tough wolf.

But on the other hand, there were six focus points on the first day, two bear trainers and the people on the left and right of the bear trainers, so the situation became complicated.

"The speeches of players 8 and 9 are good, there is no doubt about that, but whether they are good people depends on the side they stand on and the wolf pit they point to."

“单独分析8、9的发言，我觉得8是狼的可能性要比9要大一些，主要是8希望驯熊师在自己身边的发言略显做作。”

"Anyway, I feel this way. This is not logical. After all, everyone has different ideas and understandings. It can only be said to be my personal intuition."

"Player 9 must listen carefully to the good guy's speech when talking to him, and don't miss any details. He even said that details are more important than logic. This mentality makes me think that he should not be a werewolf who uses his speech as an identity for himself."

"Including his statement that good guys don't need to worry about hidden wolves on the first day, lest the logic line is too complicated to figure out, which makes me feel that he is not worthy of the wolf card."

"In general, player 9 is of a higher status than player 8. Both of their comments are benign and biased. Although I pointed out that player 8 is a little contrived, it doesn't mean that I think there is something wrong with him."

"If I can, I won't question them. After all, my main suspicion right now is that the police are behind the scenes."

not good!

Gu Feng felt that player No. 4’s comments on players No. 8 and 9 were not as good as those of player No. 5.

Although overall, their definitions of the identities of 8 and 9 are similar, both say that 8 and 9 are good, but they cannot fully acknowledge them.

But when it comes to details, Player No. 5 chats more naturally and smoothly, and his mentality is more in line with that of a bear tamer.

Or maybe it could be said that 5's idea was closer to Gu Feng's. He didn't think too much on the first day and accepted 8 and 9 first. However, 4 seemed to have some hostility and doubt towards 8, which made Gu Feng feel that this was not a good idea.

Of course.

He thinks it is not very good, which only represents himself. Maybe others think this is the highlight of Player 4's speech. People have different ideas.

"I have basically talked about everything that needs to be talked about. The police have limited information, so I can only reveal this much. 6 is a good person, and at least 5 and 6 will definitely not meet."

"Otherwise, 5 wouldn't dare to pretend to be a bear tamer, let alone lead the trend to say that 6 might be a hidden wolf."

"8 and 9 are the ones to be recognized for now. Player 3 should be the main suspect. After the alarm, it is very likely that multiple wolves will be opened. After all, I was accurately killed in a fight."

"Pass!"

[Player No. 3 please speak]

"When it comes to 4 and 5 jumping bear trainers, I am definitely more inclined to side with player 5. This has nothing to do with 4's suspicion that 5 and I might be teammates with wolves. It's mainly because his speech didn't make me want to side with him."

"5 is in the front position, 5 and 6 are not on the same side, 6 is a good guy who can be recognized, 4 has achieved this point."

"But what I really want to hear is that player 4 can't make a double wolf with 4 and 6."

"If there are two wolves at 4 and 6, and the bear trainer is roaring, player 6 will most likely jump first and kill the bear trainer behind the warning."

"This is equivalent to an open-book exam. The bear roars. The bear trainer knows there is a wolf next to him, and the wolf also knows there is a bear trainer next to him."

"But 6 spoke in front of 5 without any defensive moves, which means he and 4 did not meet. From 5's perspective, 4 and 6 could not play together."

"And he should be more inclined to believe that player No. 4 is the wolf, because player No. 6 did not make a strong move."

"The most important thing is that his teammate 6 might be a Hidden Wolf. This is even more wrong. If 6 is a Hidden Wolf, and he knows that 4 is his teammate, would he have no idea about 5?"

"These are the bad things about 4 that 5 should have talked about as a bear trainer. Unfortunately, 4 didn't talk about them at all. He just kept saying that he didn't know how to win over a good person. It felt to me that he was a little panicked and confused, and didn't know how to speak for a while."

"So, I think it's unlikely that 4 is a bear tamer. 5 is more like a bear tamer, but his speech wasn't particularly good. At least he didn't handle the details I just talked about well."

Gu Feng finally chose to temporarily stand on the side of player No. 5, because the speech of player No. 4 was too ordinary, even failing to pass, and there was no logical output that would make people's eyes light up.

Although player No. 5's performance was also satisfactory, he at least jumped first. Player No. 4 was equivalent to jumping from the spot after receiving the check and kill, so he was naturally shorter than Player No. 5.

In this case, Player 4 wants the good guys to side with him and believe that he is a bear tamer, and this will not work without some highlights.

"Player 5, you are a bear tamer, so don't doubt whether 4 and 6 can be a pair of wolves. It's unlikely if you think about it."

"If 4 and 6 are wolves, 6 will really jump to the bear trainer. After all, they know the approximate location of the bear trainer."

"The main point of this board is to strike first. If the wolf speaks in the front position, he can bet that there is a bear trainer next to him, and then jump out to fight the bear trainer, not to mention the situation of 4 or 6 pairs of wolves."

"Player 6 didn't shit on you, so you should have a little bit of goodwill towards him instead of suspecting he is a wolf."

"Of course, if you think what I say makes sense, then listen to me. If you think what I say is wrong, then just ignore it."

"I am only standing by your side temporarily because I am not very satisfied with 4's speech. There is nothing wrong with him suspecting 3 and 5 of being a pair of wolves and suspecting the police of opening multiple wolves, but he just didn't talk about what I wanted to hear."

"Oh, by the way, I don't think Player 4's definition and comments on the identities of Players 8 and 9 are particularly good. Overall, they are not as good as Player 5's."

"How can 8 be pretentious for wanting a bear trainer to be around? He made it very clear why he wanted a bear trainer to be around. I think it's normal. After all, everyone has their own little thoughts. This doesn't seem to be pretentious."

"To be honest, after 4's chat, I'm starting to wonder if 4 and 8 are a pair of wolves, and 4 is deliberately stepping on 8 to create an opposing side." "If that's the case, I can only say that 4 is a good teammate seller, and 8's mentality is probably going to collapse."

"So, player 8, I will pay close attention to your speech. Although you talked very well on the police, and I recognized you, 4 is indeed a bit forced to sell your perspective."

"It's going to be hard to get the No. 9 player in this round unless he has a clear breakthrough in his speech."

"As for the police badge, here's what I thought. Why don't you give it to me? I volunteered. I think I have good logic and can lead the team."

"But I'm not a god. I have to say this in advance. Of course, if you think I have status just because I dare to ask for a police badge, that's your business. I have no right to interfere. I just simply think I can lead the team and get the votes."

Gu Feng wants to lead the team with a police badge.

If he can get the police badge and the tough guy is eliminated on the first day, then he will surely win the MVP.

There is another reason. The policeman does not want to speak in the front position. Once player No. 5 gets the police badge, he will definitely choose to let player No. 4 speak in reverse order, and then he will be the second one.

This is what makes Gu Feng feel a little uncomfortable. If he can return the vote in the last position, there is a high probability that he can eliminate the wolf who jumped into the trap.

But he would not reveal his identity just for the police badge. If the wolf thinks he is a god for daring to ask for the police badge, there is nothing he can do.

Opinions on this matter vary from person to person.

Some people may think that if he wants to be a god, it is impossible for him to be so high-profile and even ask for a police badge for fear that the wolf will not notice him.

Originally, Wolf didn't know who to kill at night, so his remarks were just asking for trouble. The one who wanted to kill someone with a police badge couldn't kill Hidden Wolf.

[Player No. 2 please speak]

"Sure. I don't know what others think, but I raise five hands in favor of player 3 taking the police badge. I can tell from his speech that he can't be a wolf."

"Originally, the 5th player jumped to the bear tamer. I was a little skeptical about the 3rd and 5th wolves. With this position structure, it is normal for the wolf to jump to the front position to fight the bear tamer."

"But after listening to Player 3's speech, I knew I was overthinking it."

"Although he was on the side 5, his logic was very correct and he didn't try to force himself to be on the side and lead the rhythm. This gave me a very good listening experience and impression."

"The most important thing is that he always stands on the side of 5, but he often discusses 5's problems. For example, he said that 5 shouldn't doubt 5 and 4's duo of wolves. If the two of them were really wolves, 6 wouldn't have made no defensive moves. Another example is that 6 shouldn't have such a strong hostility towards 5."

"I agree with all these logics. To be honest, I had never thought of this before Player 3 brought it up. Once he brought it up, I felt it made sense."

"But these are not the fundamental reasons why I recognized player 3. The reason why I agree with player 3 taking the police badge is that if he gets to player 4, the wolf will sell the perspective, and 4 and 8 are likely to be double wolves."

"This logic is the finishing touch of his speech, and it really opened my eyes."

"The more I think about it, the more it makes sense. If player 4 is a wolf, there is no reason for him to force logic to beat a good guy. There is no benefit. Only when 4 or 8 are wolves, it is more logical for him to step on his wolf teammates to establish his identity."

"I am convinced by the speech made by Player 3. It is obvious that he is better than me. And it is obvious that he is not worthy of holding a wolf badge. It is really suitable for him to lead the team with a police badge."

Player No. 2 stood up and immediately acknowledged Gu Feng. It wasn’t just a simple acknowledgement, he basically wouldn’t bother to ask if Gu Feng was a wolf anymore.

When Gu Feng said he wanted to get a police badge, he agreed very much. It was a blessing to have such a big boss leading the team.

Now he firmly believes that no matter who is the bear tamer among 4 and 5, Gu Feng is definitely a good guy, and he can never be a wolf teammate on the same side with anyone else.

If there are 3 or 4 pairs of wolves, Gu Feng doesn't need to set the pace and attack his wolf teammates. With the bear on his back, he can just incite and set the pace for his wolf teammates.

After all, he had thought of so many problems in player No. 5's speech. If Gu Feng and No. 4 were wolf teammates, he could have used these logics to beat No. 5, but he did not do so, which was enough to prove that No. 3 and No. 4 did not meet.

Similarly, if there are 3 or 5 pairs of wolves, since Gu Feng has already decided to charge, he will not talk so much about the bad aspects of his wolf teammates.

He talked about two or three of them in one breath. Isn't this just ruining the Wolf's teammates' reputation and giving the good guys a reason to attack Player No. 5, who is pretending to be a Wolf?

Gu Feng's behavior clearly wasn't enough to deal with 3 or 5 pairs of wolves.

He is not on the same side as 4 or 5, so he is an independent good guy. What's more, he is logical, thoughtful, and leads the team with a police badge, which is really nice.

"If I were to take sides, I would definitely follow player 3. He said that he is currently leaning towards player 5 being a bear tamer, so I would agree."

"No matter what, Player 4 jumped out under the threat of a check, so his credibility is already low."

"Although we cannot rule out the possibility that the wolf jumped first to attack the bear trainer, the possibility of being able to attack so accurately is still relatively low."

"If Player 4's speech is good and has a logical output that makes people's eyes light up, then we can consider that Player 5 is fighting against the bear tamer."

"The problem is that 4 is really just average at chatting. Anyone can make the same comments as him. It's impossible for good people to support him even if there is a small probability."

"And player 4 said that after the police, there will be multiple wolves. My bottom card is a good guy. I admit it to player 3. Where are the so-called multiple wolves?"

"I can't kill 4, 1, and 11 who haven't spoken yet just to suit 12's logic."

"If we talk about many wolves, there should be at least two wolves after the police call to be considered many wolves. Two wolves at 1, 11, and 12? If I talk like this, I'll be surprised if the three of them don't beat me to death."

"So, since player 4 can't stand by his side, we can only believe that player 5 is the bear tamer, at least for now."

"Player No. 6 can be temporarily recognized. Although his speech on the police is relatively brief, 4 and 6 cannot be double wolves. Since 4 is a wolf, we can only put him aside for now."

"8 and 9's comments are all good, but 4 and 8 may be double wolves. The reason is what player 3 just said. 4 may be selling the perspective. He means well but ends up with bad results."

"Okay, that's all I want to say about the police badge. Stand by player 5. If no god card jumps out to take the police badge in the back position, I especially hope that players 7 and 10 will vote for the police badge for player 3. That's it, it's passed."

[Player No. 1 please speak]

"I also think that the police badge can be given to player No. 3. Regardless of whether he has an identity or not, he dares to say that he wants to get a police badge and dares to say that he has the ability to lead a team. I don't think he is a wolf."

"Originally, player 4 was going to be a bear tamer, so player 3 would be the focus. If he was a wolf, he would definitely try every means to make the good guys believe that he and player 5 were not on the same side. Don't play 3 and 5 as wolves."

"With this mentality and pressure, Player 3 still dares to say that he wants to lead the team with a police badge? I don't believe a wolf can be so calm and arrogant."

"Moreover, judging from the logic of his speech, player No. 3 is unlikely to be a good teammate with players No. 4 and No. 5."

Player No. 1 also supports Gu Feng to take the police badge and lead the team. In this way, maybe he can really support the sheriff.

As long as the 11th and 12th in the latter position don't make a move to get the police badge, the 7th and 10th under the police should be happy to vote for Gu Feng.

Gu Feng’s status is very high now, and he is recognized by almost everyone in the audience, but this will bring about a huge problem: he might be stabbed at night.

Oh no, it's not possible, it's very likely, at least more than 90% probability. For a good guy who is hard to beat and has good logic, the Wolves always kill him as soon as possible.

Unless the tough wolf was pushed out on the first day and forced to kill the bear tamer first, otherwise, Gu Feng would hardly be able to see the next day's sunrise alive.

"Player 2 and 3 are on the side of player 5, so I can't be treated specially."

"I don't think their speeches sound like wolves. Just like what player 2 said, if you stand on side 4, you have to use multiple wolves after the alarm. The problem is that I can't find multiple wolves after the alarm."

"I haven't heard the speeches of 11 and 12 yet. I will consider whether to use more wolves after the police. The current situation tells me that the police don't have more wolves. Player No. 4 took the check and jumped, which was more like a pull-up shot from the spot."

"But I won't stand on the side to the death. To be honest, I have doubts about the statement of player No. 5. When he just jumped into the bear tamer, I subconsciously felt that players 3 and 5 were two wolves, and they were fighting against player No. 4."

“因为5说4、6当中开狼，不知道是一狼还是两狼这句话太有问题了，4、6双狼，6号玩家还不悍跳驯熊师？”

"The bear roared last night, and the bear trainer was right next to him. Player 5 was sandwiched between two wolves. I don't believe that 6 vs 5 didn't have any ideas."

"This is different from a prophet. The wolves don't know where the prophet is. So even if two wolves are trying to kill a good person, the good person may not respond."

"But it's the bear trainer's board. They knew the bear was roaring, and the bear trainer was right next to them. How could they not take the initiative?"

"Player 5 can suspect that 4 and 6 might be twin wolves, and that 6 is a hidden wolf or something like that, which is problematic, but 4's comments are more ordinary."

"I think the two of them are equally matched, because player 5 jumped first, and player 4 jumped from the back position under the check, so the bear trainer's face is lower."

"The top police officer is on the side of player 5 for now. Whether the bottom police officer will change his mind depends on what players 4 and 5 say."

"As for 8 and 9, they were good to talk to, but I don't think they are good people. Tell me directly that there may be a wolf among them."

"The most important thing is that after I acknowledge 2 and 3, the wolf pit is quite crowded. If I acknowledge 8 and 9, there will be too few people I can order. This is definitely not okay. I don't want to end up not being able to order all the people in the wolf pit."

"So, I don't call them 8 or 9 as a police officer, but I don't think they are good people either. X's identity doesn't define them."

"Okay, that's all I want to say on the police. You're a good guy, that's it. It's over."