Real teaching, but diary flow

Hey, that's where your thinking is wrong.

The winners should be the ones to analyze and reflect on their performance. Only by analyzing why the winners won can you better reflect on your own actions, right?

Holding onto a mistake can only help you avoid it, but mistakes are inevitable. Learning from past mistakes only reduces the probability of repeating them.

What we really need to do is study why we won, whether we can learn from it, copy it, and apply it.

Understand?

As for my people... so what!

What do you mean by "mine" or "not mine"? We are all highly educated, excellent students.

We must treat everyone equally, understand?

Let's start with the settlement process.

There are a total of fifty outposts on this island. For a place that is 0.5 square kilometers, this number may seem a bit dense, but it is clear that this cannot be quantified simply with numbers.

Those who have actually walked on the island can probably tell that this number is actually quite accurate.

If we don't play the game of openly seizing territory, and everyone secretly hides and tries to capture strongholds while keeping the leader's identity a secret, we can probably only capture about ten strongholds at most.

The score wasn't actually that high.

That's probably what the school hopes for.

Instead of the current situation where a class haphazardly takes over all the strongholds.

But... who cares about the school's opinion?

I don't care anyway.

Looking at the final settlement, the score is divided into two parts: the initial reward score, which is subtracted from the consumption score, and the final stronghold capture score.

Taking Class C as an example, despite having spent all their points and even having committed other violations, they still managed to gain points for capturing the stronghold.

The school didn't say it explicitly, but there are probably two possibilities.

One violation was 'using another class's base without permission.' This violation was determined to be caused by another class's violation, so Class C did not actually have any points deducted. Although the base score was cleared, the base occupation points that should have been given will still be given.

Another point is that the aforementioned violations will still result in point deductions, but the deductions will be for the initial reward points that have already been cleared and reset to zero. Therefore, the points for capturing strongholds will still be awarded.

I don't know which one is accurate.

We could have had our beloved Class B as a control group, since eating those two rule-breaking foods would have made Class B and Class C the only ones left.

Unfortunately, they were disqualified and could not be scored.

I'll consider this the last one.

Since this is the last one, actually... I still have a tactic I can tell you.

Although it's a bit late to tell you this now that the exam is over, I just have to say it!

Maybe you guys can develop a time machine to go back in time and retake the exam?

Actually, this school, although it has many bad aspects, is especially unfriendly to the weak, and is very... well, 'meritocracy'.

But there's one thing that's always been good.

'Guaranteed minimum' mechanism.

Water and electricity are free, accommodation is free, tuition is free—these are all conditions that have been stated before.

In addition, the school cafeteria offers free wild vegetable meals, and the convenience store offers free daily necessities. The school will thoughtfully consider and provide these necessary items free of charge.

Even this deserted island test is the same; it's free, with no limit on the amount of invincible 'absorbent cloth' provided as basic building materials for everyone.

From this, you should be able to get a glimpse of the school's style, right?

Competition and rivalry are acceptable, but a safety net must be secured.

It's not like Hope's Peak Academy, a private school. If things get too extreme and cause the most serious and desperate incidents for the students, it won't do the school any good.

It would be pointless if it turned into a case of student abuse.

That's why the 'zero-point strategy' mentioned in the first month came into being.

Once the score drops to zero, it will not drop any further, leaving room for a comeback; there is no option to accept a negative score.

By now, I'm sure some of you know what I'm going to say, right?

Yes, that's right, it's the zero-point strategy.

You can also play it in the special test on the deserted island.

I'm not talking about the zero-point tactic of Class D, which involves buying all the supplies, selling them, having fun, and then returning to the cruise ship. That's too inefficient and would widen the gap between classes.

Unless they really aren't aiming for a draft position, they definitely won't play that game.

The zero-point strategy I'm talking about definitely involves two steps.

The first step is still to sell supplies as usual; why not sell them if it's free?

But reserve enough supplies to survive for seven days, or even less than seven days, four or five days would be enough.

The exact amount to keep will be calculated later. In any case, resources should be kept, and any excess points should be exchanged. Exchange points for personal points if possible, and exchange for contracts that provide continuous lifesteal.

Maximize profits.

Then don't rush to run away. You'll feel relaxed back on the cruise ship, but the exam will be out of your reach.

If you ask me why I'm not going back to the cruise ship when I already have zero points?

I can only say that I still lack experience and my thinking is not broad enough.

There are also stronghold points!

You're just going to throw away those precious stronghold points? They're almost a thousand points in total!

Isn't this more than the initial 300 points?

Even if, I mean even if outpost points are deducted, even if my guess is wrong, outpost points are settled together.

Are you just going to stand by and watch the other three classes happily clock in and rake in points, only to have tens of thousands of dollars in monthly payouts casually deposited into their accounts?

Can you stand by and watch the gap continue to widen?

As I've said before, if you're going to play the Zero Score Plan, you have to be prepared to be a troublemaker!

It's precisely because we've caused chaos that you all have your chance.

Take a closer look at the rules. This violation will result in points deduction, that violation will result in points deduction. It looks quite scary, right?

But there's only one truly problematic, fatal, and disqualifying criterion.

'Violence, looting, and destruction of equipment'

To be precise, it's these three items.

The others only resulted in minor point deductions, and they were all points used in the exam.

Will it drop to a negative number? No, since it won't, then it just means—deducting whatever you want?

Please don't use QQ, and don't use QQ everywhere.

Those who have no weaknesses, don't care about deductions, and execute the zero-point strategy are invincible.

You will become the most powerful troublemaker.

Interfering with other people's daily activities, interfering with other people's check-in, interfering with other people doing anything.

Anyway, it won't deduct points. As long as you hold back, as long as you're shameless enough, and control your fists, that's right, just like a streetwalker, purely standing on the street, blocking the way, with a clear price of 500 yuan per move.

How about a more playful, cheeky attitude?

Sister Bao is from Baoxing.

People have always been most helpless when it comes to rascals.

The logical extension downwards, besides blocking the road and collecting money, wouldn't it also allow everyone to sit together, hug the stronghold, harass here, and affect there, as long as no violence is used, no resources are plundered, and no equipment is destroyed.

There are plenty of ways to act shamelessly.

Alas, it's a pity that the only one who could think of a similar method was Dragon Boy, but Dragon Boy was somewhat limited in his abilities and couldn't really go all out to do it.

Ultimately, he had no reason to be a troublemaker, since his goal wasn't to bring down the school, and dragging everyone down with him would just be asking for trouble.

This is why, although everyone may have thought of a plan like the zero-point strategy, no one has ever actually implemented it.

There's no need to go to such extremes. School recommendations aren't everything, and graduating from Class A doesn't require risking everything.

That concludes the debriefing. The major violations, which were essentially the same points discussed in the meeting, will each be deducted 100 points according to the standards for major violations.

On its own, this statement may not seem like much, but it does offer a glimpse into the school's practices and standards of conduct.

Schools have an internal logic for deducting and adding points, with the standard being 'one hundred points deducted for serious violations'.

The fluctuations will not exceed this line, which is why the transfer score of 20 million seems so unattainable.

Because the school never intended for you to transfer classes through normal means.

Of course, it's hard to say whether one can transfer classes by relying on the money distributed monthly through class points, because the school will definitely control the upcoming special exams while saving costs.

The exams, which were similar to two 'class point distribution' exams on a deserted island and similar to behavioral norms exams, have been replaced by 'class point transfer' exams with a competitive theme.

The weaker class's class points are transferred to the stronger class's class points, or the weaker class steals the stronger class's class points to achieve a reversal.

In other words, the next 'special exam for preferential treatment' is coming up.

Yes, I'm going to give away some spoilers.

If you have any ideas, take notes and listen. If you don't, just wait until the day of the exam and listen to my instructions.

First, the school will divide all students into a certain number of groups according to a certain pattern, and each group will contain an equal number of students from four classes.

Second, among these students, a role called 'preferential treatment' will be selected in advance according to a certain pattern.

Third, the school will provide a certain amount of time for discussion, during which students can discuss, converse, think, and draw conclusions on their own.

Fourth, the condition for ending the exam is simple: inform the school of your guess of the recipient of the preferential treatment, write down the name, and submit it.

Fifth, the school will announce different exam results based on the different answers.

Roughly speaking, the preferential treatment test consists of these five rules.

The details will be quite complicated, and I'm too lazy to write them down. You'll find out on the day of the exam; the teacher will announce them.

I have a general idea of ​​what to do and what I want to do.

But I'll be the riddle-maker here for now.

Now, let's talk about Class A.

Class A, formerly Class B, was assessed by the school as being perfectly acceptable, at least initially. They were simply a class that was neither particularly good nor particularly bad.

Therefore, in the initial behavioral norms test and the deserted island test, they should not have achieved scores higher than the original Class A.

Even though the little princess is actually quite disappointing.

The reason I achieved this result is, of course, because I took action.

What are you thinking about?

I can help someone up if I want, and I can step on them if I want.

I like to tease the little princess, so I'm going to tease her badly. Luckily, there's a graduate from the gym in Class A, so I might as well take advantage of it.

Absolute violence, dominant power.

And with my little bit of encouragement.

Reaping the rewards of victory was a piece of cake.

Do you even know what a "white gym graduate" means?

Do you know the value of a white gym?

As for the others... well, it's already great that they didn't drag us down.

Don't think I'm being perfunctory. Really, you don't understand how rare it is to have a teammate who won't drag you down.

Look at Class D, then look at Class Sakayanagi, look at Grandpa Yamauchi, then look at that kid, and you'll see how right I am.

Good teammates aren't necessarily good, but bad teammates are definitely bad.