I want to make a game

Windwos1 has been released, and sales are very good. MSDos system is even more popular. Unix is ​​too professional, and the user experience is not good, so now it can be said that personal computer software is about to be dominated by Microsoft.

It's just that the number of personal computers is still too small to show it. In addition, Microsoft is still cooperating with IBM at this time. As a software supplier, most people only know that IBM does not know that the computer system is Microsoft's.

In this case, it is not a simple matter to ask people to change the operating system they are accustomed to. Let's see how many people who are used to Windows in future generations will transfer to other systems?

How many people who are used to BSP;OS still use Windows OS? This group of users is actually the most loyal, but they are passive.

Taking the lead means occupying the market. Do you really think Microsoft is a fool? China is not the only country where Windows OS piracy is rampant.

Why do people do this? This loss is not even the slightest, but they still acquiesce to the existence of piracy, just to occupy the market. 100 million people use piracy, there are always a few who use it, right? This recovers the cost

.

The most important thing is to attack opponents and subtly change people's habits. When everyone is accustomed to the Windows system, other competitors will die out little by little.

That is the world of Microsoft. This kind of thing is not uncommon. The food delivery war, the taxi-hailing software war, and the money-making bicycle war all have this idea.

Even if you lose money, you still have to seize the market. What's more, Microsoft doesn't lose money and even makes some profits. When it completely dominates the market, it can do whatever it wants. After all, it's just my family. If you don't use mine, you have no other use.

What he values ​​​​is the role of Paul Allen. Technology can always find a replacement, even if it is close, it doesn't matter. There is no one who can break Microsoft's monopoly.

"Well, I understand that an emerging world-class company does need an authoritarian leader. Bill is like this, and so are you. Although the methods are different, you both hold the company firmly in your own hands."

Liu Zhiyuan did not defend himself. Paul Allen will experience his dictatorship sooner or later. Sophistry at this time is just laying the groundwork for the future. It is unnecessary. Anyone with a brain understands how important the leader is in an emerging company.

Dictatorship is not a derogatory term in this case, on the contrary, it is a compliment, because when the leader of a company can dominate a company, especially a world-class company, it means that their role is irreplaceable.

It’s not that these leaders want to be dictatorial, but that they must be dictatorial because others cannot follow their footsteps, just like the current Han Dynasty.

Without Liu Zhiyuan, the Han Dynasty can still survive. After all, the current structure is almost completed, but it is impossible to become a unique existence!

Nintendo and Microsoft will not allow the Han Dynasty to simply dominate the world. Whether Apple can survive until 2000 without Steve Jobs is a question.

Even Hiroshi Yamauchi, who is now criticized within Nintendo, was a hero hailed by Nintendo back then. Without his dictatorship, Nintendo would not be where it is today.

It can be said that the founder of every world-class company is a dictator, because they must be dictatorial. If they are not dictatorial, then their company cannot become world-class.

Speaking of this, Liu Zhiyuan suddenly thought of Steve Jobs. The Apple dictator was having a very bad life now. He targeted every place that could stumbling over Steve Jobs.

Jobs said that he could not return to Apple. If he did, he would be in big trouble. With Jobs' hatred for him, he might not even have a chance to cooperate.

He is actually very afraid that Jobs will return to Apple, because in the future, Apple will occupy a large share in the computer field. It will be a big problem to deal with Microsoft and IBM, and adding another Apple

Why is he afraid that Jobs will return to Apple? It’s not Apple phones or Apple computers, it’s Jobs’ advanced ideas. This is the fundamental reason for Apple’s greatness.

He had those prophetic visions through rebirth, but Jobs was not born again. This man's genius was unreasonable.

In fact, Steve Jobs has always been unpopular within Apple, but every step he took was successful in the end, and the results clearly slapped everyone in the face. Even if I don't like it, I have to endure it.

If the computer field is divided into several eras, and the kings correspond to the gaming industry, then Atari is the corresponding IBM, and the development of the two companies is completely the same.

They were all successfully revolted by their subordinates. It's just that Atari committed suicide by itself, and it was the kind of death that was transparent, while Microsoft relied on its ability to overthrow IBM, and IBM did not suddenly die suddenly. This is the only

The difference.

At this time, Apple was just like Sega. It wanted to rebel all the time, but it couldn't succeed. Not only that, it was almost killing itself. If Jobs had not come back, Apple would really be killing itself.

There was actually a chance to get the position. As long as Steve Jobs had not left Apple, the situation in the historical computer field would probably be very different, because after Apple welcomed Steve Jobs back again, it directly started take-off mode.

In the era when Windows 95 was rampant, Jobs just relied on the BSP;OS system and some advanced ideas to grab a piece of the world.

In later generations, some people will always say that the experience of bsp;os is not as good as that of windwos. This is true, because it is not a system designed for individual users at all. However, in this era, the experience of bsp;os is many times better than that of windwos.

Otherwise, why can Apple compete with Microsoft in the market? Just because it looks good? Nonsense, it depends on the practical experience. In fact, the experience of later Apple systems is not bad either.

It's just that this was a mistake in Jobs' decision-making. This mistake has made it difficult for Apple to turn around. That is because Jobs valued enterprise customers too much.

Mac is too professional and too closed. In this era, this decision is not wrong, because no one could have imagined that computers would develop so rapidly.

Today's computers are simply not affordable for individual users, and the software is mostly for office use, with very little for entertainment. Buying it for office use? Except for the needs of executives of large companies, ordinary people cannot use it at all.

But when individual users became the main consumer group, the disadvantages of the Apple system became apparent, because individual users do not need such professional things.

On the contrary, they need the most convenient and fastest system. Microsoft's advantages are clearly visible, such as a huge software lineup and super compatibility. On these two points, Apple has no chance of beating Microsoft.

But Jobs didn't even look back at this situation, and went straight to the dark side. In the end, he actually succeeded. The arrival of the mobile era allowed Apple to successfully surpass Microsoft.

It relies on a closed system. Many people say madwos for computers, but I have never heard of other systems that are better than Apple for mobile phones.

Regardless of whether Apple phones are always slower than the times, they are easy to use and don’t lag. This is the biggest advantage. If there is no gap in the software lineup, except for being more expensive, Apple phones can be said to have the best experience.

Regardless of his luck or his advanced ideas, in short, Jobs can never return to Apple. He can do whatever he likes outside, and Apple will never want to go back anyway.