Werewolf: I'm a natural showman, you win easily

Chapter 74: Strong force, poor logic
[Player No. 6 please speak]

"Player No. 5 is checking and killing, and the police badge flow 9 and 1 are tested in order."

6 stood up and threw a check to 5 who had just spoken. This was exciting.

Judging from what Player 5 said just now, he doesn't seem to want to stand on the side of Player 2.

Although he said that he would not take sides, judging from his attitude towards 3, he should be more inclined to the 2 and 3 duo of wolves.

Even if he doesn't have this intention, others will think he does. After all, number 3 is on the side of player 2, and number 3 is a wolf, which is somewhat like shooting the bull from a distance.

As the saying goes, when beating a dog, you have to look at its owner. 3 is the younger brother of player 2, and when he clicks 3, it means the wolf, which naturally makes people have deeper associations.

"I don't need to talk about my experience in checking player number 5, right? I just touched people around me. It was either 5 or 7. I didn't think much about it at the time and just touched player number 5. As a result, my hands were covered with wolf hair."

"As for the badge flow 9, 1 successive test, there must be some idea behind it. The first badge flow was hit on player No. 9 under the police. You can guess without me saying it. I am trying to solicit votes."

"Player No. 4 has joined the first badge group of the wolf-like gang. Regardless of whether he is a wolf or a good guy, I'm afraid he won't vote for me. In this case, I can only ask for the vote of Player No. 9."

"At worst, we can just tie for a PK. I'm not afraid of talking more. The more I talk, the better."

"So player number 9, you have to vote for me no matter what. Even if you are a wolf, I advise you to make a counter-hook. If you dare to rush to vote, I will definitely label you a wolf and beat you up."

"The second police badge flow hits player 1 because player 2 throws gold water to player 1, and I can't tell whether player 1 is a good guy or a wolf, so I just put him in the second police badge flow. Anyway, there is no one more suitable to be in the police badge flow."

"And with this board, the tough wolf might throw gold water to Wolf Crow Claw to pass on the message, so that Wolf Crow Claw will not know who is the wolf teammate and who is the prophet."

"Although this is likely to attract the attention of the fortune teller, think about it the other way around. Many people are not very good at playing Wolf and Wolf Gold. They always think that Wolf and Wolf Gold Water are canvassing for votes."

"And this is the loophole that Wolves can exploit. Doing the opposite may have unexpected results."

"Of course, I don't want to play 1 and 2 wolves. I'm worried about player 1, and I hope the good guys won't take over player 1 so easily."

"Player No. 5 was just trying to set the pace so that players 1 and 2 wouldn't meet. This is one of the reasons why I'm worried about player No. 1."

“倘若1、2、5是三狼，5号玩家就有可能忽悠好人强行把1认下来。”

"I don't know if I'm overthinking it. Let's listen to Player 1's talk. He's speaking in the first position, so I can't really hear anything."

Player No. 6 talked about the reason why he got the police badge flow 9 and 1 smoothly.

The first police badge flow is purely for canvassing votes. He has to ensure that he at least has a tie for PK. It is not realistic to get the police badge directly. No matter whether player No. 4 is a good guy or a wolf, it is impossible for him to vote for him under the pressure of the police badge flow.

Player No. 6 is very open-minded. It is a foregone conclusion that the 4-diamond Wolves will get a ticket to the bandit list, and he cannot turn back. In that case, just let him be.

Now all he had to do was make sure he could get the ticket from player No. 9, so he put enough pressure on No. 9. As long as No. 9 dared to get the bandit ticket, he would beat No. 9.

The second police badge flow was hit on player No. 1 because he was worried about No. 1 and always felt that No. 1 might be in the Wolves.

No matter what, 1 is the one who took over the gold and water of the Wolf, and 5 is still setting the pace so that 1 and 2 are not on the same side. These situations all indicate that 1 may be in the Wolf team, and we must not easily treat him as a good guy.

"Player 3 should be a good guy. Although he is on the side of Player 2 and is canvassing for votes for Player 2, his behavior looks like that of a pair of wolves. However, judging from Player 2's attitude towards him, Player 3 and Player 5 will never meet."

"Player 5's statement that no matter who the prophet is, Player 3 is in the wolf pit is enough for me to recognize Player 3."

"Unless Hard Drive No. 5 is Wolf Crow Claw, he doesn't know that No. 3 is his wolf teammate, so he wants to set the pace and attack No. 3 as a defensive position."

"But the way the police are playing is a bit too malicious. I'd better recognize player No. 3 first. If he is still a Wolves player and doesn't speak well, then I can only play player No. 5, Wolf Crow Claw."

"In fact, among the four members of the wolf team, excluding the stalker player No. 2, I checked 5 and it is a wolf, so the probability that he is Wolf Crow Claw is one in three."

"Anyway, no matter if he is a little wolf or a big wolf, we must push him out today. If a little wolf explodes in the outside position, it means that 5 is Wolf Crow Claw. Only when two little wolves explode can his skills be unlocked."

It is reasonable for 6 to recognize player 3, although 3 is on the side of 2, but from the perspective of the common side relationship, 3 and 5 cannot be wolf teammates, unless 5 is the Wolf Crow Claw.

But this would be too hostile to player 3. There is no need to say that player 3 is the Wolf Crow Claw just to say that player 5 is a wolf.

Theoretically, it makes sense, and this situation is indeed possible, but we cannot talk about it this way now.

If he dares to play three wolves at 2, 3, and 5, I'm afraid the person in the back position will be able to smash him with a dog head.

So, I can only accept 3 for the time being.

The most important thing is, the four people in the front row have spoken, he can’t criticize them all, right?

2 is a tough jump, 5 is a check and kill, and 1 is beaten into the police badge flow by him, and then 3 is a wolf, which really offends everyone. He will only do this unless he is crazy.

"That's all I have to say about the police. I'll repeat it one last time. Player 5 will check and kill. The police badge will be verified by 9 and 1. Player 9 must vote for me for the police badge. That's it. I passed."

[Player No. 7 please speak]

"How should I put it? Player 6 does have some strength in checking and killing Player 5, but I'm not too satisfied with the logic of the disk."

"I say he's powerful because he threw 5 checks, which doesn't seem like something a wolf can do."

"In fact, judging from their speeches and actions, it seems that Player 2 and Player 5 do not meet. Otherwise, why would Player 5 push away a good person who was on the wrong side?"

"Player No. 3 worked so hard to get votes for Player No. 2. In this case, Player No. 5 is the wolf in the 3th game, which is equivalent to destroying the wolf teammate. It will make people think that Player No. 2 and Player No. 3 are both wolves, which is not logical."

"The most important thing is that although Player 5 said that he would not take sides for the time being, I think most people can feel that he does not really want to take sides with 2."

"If player No. 6 is a wolf and is about to join the wolf team, it would be a good idea to throw gold water to him to get votes. This gold water will most likely pull player No. 5 into the water, which means there will be five wolves on the field."

"If we throw a check at him, it will help him open his eyes, and he will stand on the side of the prophet. For a wolf, this is not a wise choice."

"That's why I said that player No. 6 was very strong in checking and killing 5. This strength does not only refer to the strong checking and killing, but also the strong checking and killing for 5."

"If I were a wolf, I would definitely throw 5 gold water to drag him down, which is better than throwing a check to kill him."

The first thing Ren Fan said when he stood up was his evaluation of player No. 6.

The inspection and killing are powerful, but the logic is not good enough.

According to him, the strength of 6 is not only reflected in the information of checking and killing, but more importantly, this check and killing is for player No. 5.

From the perspective of 6 being the wolf, it is not a wise move for him to give 5 a check.

It was stupid to send a person who was about to join the Wolves into the Prophet's team.

Although it is very likely that 5 resistance will be eliminated from the game if 5 is checked, what if 5 has an identity?

而且5警上的发言，听着就不太像是跟2号玩家见面的，如果2、5双狼，5会打3吗？
In other words, if there are two wolves at 2 and 5, it is quite difficult to use player 5 as a resistance.

Instead of this, Player No. 6 might as well throw a check to Ren Fan, and then use his speech to attract votes from Player No. 5. This would be the best way.

But 6 chose a more difficult path, which is to help a good guy to correct his perspective and to deal with the somewhat difficult 2 and 5 wolves. From this point of view, 6 really doesn't seem like a tough wolf.

"Player No. 6 has some strength, but I am not satisfied with his logic because he did not focus on the Wolf Crow Claw of Player No. 5."

"After I said this, some people might think I'm nitpicking. The possibility that 5 is Wolf Crow Claw is relatively small. It's understandable that the police 6 is not arranged in this way."

"At first glance, this sounds fine, but it's not right when you consider the actual situation on the field."

"Because the speech of player 5 was a bit strange. It sounded like players 2 and 5 didn't seem like they were wolf teammates. If players 2 and 5 were both little wolves, there would be no reason for them to attack player 3 and say that he was not good enough to help player 2 to get votes or something like that."

"There is only one reasonable explanation. Players 2 and 5 are wolf teammates who have never met each other. Player 5 doesn't know whether Player 2 is a prophet or a wolf. Player 3's attitude when speaking is not very good, so he just wants to lead the pace and make Player 3 a defensive player."

"Only this is a reasonable board. I don't believe that 2 and 5 are two little wolves. 2 is not the wolf king. 5 can sell out his teammates to play a hook. There is no wolf king in this board. As 5's wolf teammate, 2 should follow 3's speech and incite 2."

"Even if he doesn't want to charge player 2, he's unlikely to sabotage it. So as a prophet, player 6 should have picked Wolf Crow's Claw instead of saying that the possibility is very small."

"This is why I am dissatisfied with the statement made by player 6. If his plate 5 is likely to be Wolf Crow Claw, and he brings up the logic I just mentioned, I will definitely support him without hesitation."

"After all, the force is strong and the logic is logical. If a prophet like this doesn't take sides, who else can he take sides with?"

"Unfortunately, Player 6 didn't talk about what I wanted to hear."

To be honest, Ren Fan actually hopes that 6 is the prophet. In this case, 5 is most likely the Wolf Crow Claw. If he touches the Wolf Crow Claw on the first night and pushes him out of the game, the good guys will have a great chance of winning.

But hope is hope, there is indeed a problem with Player No. 6's logic, or he is not satisfied with the result.

On the positive side, 6's level is not good enough and he did not think of what a prophet should have thought of. But on the negative side, 6's perspective is wrong and he might be pretending to be a wolf.

"Player No. 2 threw a gold water at No. 1, which is naturally far less powerful than No. 6. But if you think about it carefully, if he is a wolf, why doesn't he throw a check and kill at No. 3?"

"Whether or not you can fight the prophet, there is always a chance, right? Throwing gold water to the person who just spoke in the front position will most likely sell out a good person, which is unwise."

"From this point of view, the behavior of player 2 is not consistent with that of a tough wolf. Moreover, 2 and 5 are both wolves, so 2 should throw a check to 3, right?"

"The most important thing is that 6 hasn't recognized 4 under the police. Not to mention that 2 is talking to 4 frantically to solicit votes, judging from the position structure, if 2, 4, and 5 are three wolves, with player 3 in the middle, can he not take the check and kill?"

"Since he didn't accept the check, does that mean he's most likely not on the Wolves? I didn't even come up with this logic or idea."

"So, although the prophet 6 is very powerful, I don't really want to stand on his side."

"Although the prophet 2 is not very powerful, there is nothing I can criticize about his overall speech."

"I will stand on the side of Player 2 for now. I will listen to another round of speeches and may change my mind, or I may not. We will decide then."

"Okay, that's all I want to say on the police. You're a good guy, that's it. It's over."

[Player No. 8 please speak]

"When 2 and 6 are facing a prophet, they must side with 6. Player 7 just said that 6's ability to check and kill 5 is very strong. If that's the case, his prophet has a strong chance of winning. If he doesn't side with , who will he side with?"

"In fact, as 7 said, if player 6 is a wolf, would he throw a check to someone who is hostile to the prophet? There is absolutely no need to do that."

"He wants to throw a check, so it would be best if he threw a check to player 7, and then recognized player 5, in order to win his favor and votes. This is logical."

"The fact that 6 can give 5 a check means that his behavior is not in line with the Wolves' benefits, so we can only bet that he is a prophet."

Player No. 8 is on the side of Player 6. In his opinion, Player 6 should be the prophet.

If player 6 is a tough wolf, there is no reason for him to throw the check to player 5, unless he is crazy and has a high probability of joining the wolf team. Not only does he not drag him into the water, but he pushes him into the prophet team. This is illogical.

Therefore, Ren Fan was right. The strength of player No. 6 was not only in the two words "check and kill", but also because the person being checked and killed was 5.

Comparing the strength of 2 and 6, the police will undoubtedly stand on the side of player No. 6. Any hesitation on his part would be disrespectful to this check.

"Player No. 7 said that the logic of 6's game was not satisfactory and lacked the perspective of a prophet. I disagree with this." "Which prophet would start by showing that his own check was Wolf Crow's Claw? This would give people the illusion that he was forcibly showing 5 as Wolf Crow's Claw in order to stir up hostility among the good guys towards 5. This mentality and behavior is not good."

"Although player 5's speech doesn't sound like he has met player 2, it doesn't rule out that he is creating an identity for himself. After all, everyone has different ideas. There's no need to conclude that player 5 is the Wolf Crow Claw just because player 2's speech sounds like they haven't met player 5."

"Besides, it's not like Player 6 didn't mention this. I think he didn't talk about 5 being the Wolf Crow Claw because it's not appropriate to warn that 5 is the Wolf Crow Claw."

"And the remarks made by player 5 were not very good. He said that there was something wrong with player 3 canvassing for player 2. How is that a problem? If he stands on the side of player 2, who would he canvass for if he doesn't help player 2? Could it be that the so-called standing on the side is just empty talk?"

"Player No. 5 likes to act like a fool. If someone has different ideas from him, he will think that the other person is a wolf and judge others by his own standards. I feel that he has a strong desire to kill."

"I originally thought that 5 might be a wolf. 6 threw a check on him, so I'm naturally willing to stand on 6's side."

Player No. 8 only seems to agree with Ren Fan's statement that the power of the 6-5 throw is strong, and does not agree with Ren Fan's later statement that the logic of 6 is problematic.

He felt that player No. 5 might not be the Wolf Crow Claw. Everyone had different ways and ideas about playing with wolves. It was obviously unreasonable to conclude that players No. 5 and No. 2 would not meet based solely on the remarks made by police No. 5.

Even if player 5 is the Wolf Crow Claw, so what? Who can predict that he is the Wolf Crow Claw who has never met player 2? If not, then he is not a prophet?
Ren Fan's requirements for Player 6 are too harsh.

Player No. 8 felt that the fact that 6 lost the check to 5 was enough to make people stand on his side. Whether to turn back under the police would depend on the situation at that time.

It would be outrageous for the police to stand on the side of Player 2.

"Player No. 7, although you are on side 2, which is different from mine, I don't think you are a wolf, because the strong words you said to player No. 6 touched my heart."

"Although I disagree with the second half of your statement, I know you are not forcing the wolf to beat the player No. 6. You are just too harsh on No. 6."

"You think 6, as a prophet, should have thought that 5 is likely to be Wolf Crow Claw, because 2 and 5 don't look like the wolf teammates they met."

"But in reality, not even one out of ten prophets would think of going to the Wolf Crow Claw for the 5th position, because most people have a subconscious mind that they don't need to make it that complicated first."

"Like I said just now, what prophet would come up and say that the wolf I checked and killed was a big wolf?"

"Maybe you are right. Player 5 is Wolf Crow Claw. Player 6 didn't think of this because he doesn't think enough. But that doesn't mean he is not a prophet. What do you think?"

"In my eyes, you are a good person who is on the wrong side. The reason you are on the wrong side is not because of your poor logic, but because your logic level is too high. When others fail to meet your requirements, you think that they are not prophets, but sometimes prophets are not as perfect as you think."

"I hope you can turn back, because from what I heard from you, you must be a good person. If you were a wolf, you would only talk about the second half of 6, where you are not like a prophet, and you would not talk about the first half of 6, which is very powerful."

"6 is the prophet, 2 and 5 are wolves. My suggestion is to test player 3. If 5 is the Wolf Crow Claw, we can't accept 5 just because 3 is hostile to 3."

"Player 1 is most likely a good guy. Player 2 probably doesn't have the guts to throw gold water at the wolf teammate who spoke in the front position."

"The benefits of doing this are small, or even almost non-existent, but the risks are huge. It will draw the attention of the prophets and good people to 1. Once 1 becomes the focus, his identity will be easily exposed."

"If the prophet wanted to be safe, he would have put 1 into the first badge test just in case. If that were the case, he would have shot himself in the foot."

"So, I think that since players 1 and 2 don't meet, it's very likely that player 1 is a good person. Instead of targeting player 1, it's better to check player 3."

"Although player 3 may be a wolf, judging from the shared border relationship, 3 is most likely a good guy, so I won't call him a wolf on the alert, and I'll just accept it for now."

"Officer, please see if he will come back. If he still wants to go to the Wolves, he must be put into the First Badge Stream for inspection."

"Player No. 4 should be a good guy. If No. 4 is a wolf, No. 2 will not throw gold water to No. 1, but to No. 3. Unless No. 2, No. 3, No. 4, and No. 5 are wolves in a row, No. 2 will not have no defensive moves against No. 3."

“可是2、3、4、5四连狼的可能性太低了，警上没法盘，所以只能说2、4并非双狼，2号玩家才对3没有那么大的敌意。”

"Recognize player No. 4. If the policeman opens the wolf, it will be 9. If 9 votes for 6, there is nothing wrong with the policeman's speech. It doesn't sound like a wolf. Then you can play four wolves and the policeman."

"Okay, that's all I want to say on the police. Stand by player 6, but don't stand by him to death. That's it. It's over."

[Player No. 10 please speak]

"6 gives 5 a check. If you side with him, you have to play 2 and 5 as double wolves. But to be honest, I don't think 2 and 5 can be double wolves."

"If 2 is a tough wolf, how much benefit can he get by throwing gold water to 1? It's better to throw 3 to the police to kill him."

"Don't worry about whether you can kill the prophet or not. As long as you throw a check, the strength is there. As long as you don't hit an idiot, it's a win even if you kill the Dream Catcher or the Alchemist Witch."

"If the target of the check is a civilian, there is a high probability that he can be eliminated. Even if the prophet has the check, it will not be as powerful as his. At that time, the good guys will only think that he is a coward who throws the check."

"With such a huge profit, player 2 chose to throw gold water to player 1. Doesn't that sound like what a werewolf would do?"

Player No. 10's side is the same as Ren Fan's. He thinks that 2 and 5 cannot form a double wolf.

Most importantly, the act of throwing away gold and water for 2 to 1 is not in the Wolves' interest.

Obviously, there are many benefits and advantages to throwing the check to player No. 3, but No. 2 threw the gold water to No. 1. Only a prophet can do this.

Speaking of strength, player No. 2 is essentially the one who is truly powerful, while player No. 6 is only powerful on the surface.

"In fact, apart from the fact that the No. 6 player threw a check to the No. 5 player, which made him look powerful, his logic was a mess."

"Let's talk about the badge flow. How could they get 1 and 2 to have two wolves? They also said that it is possible that player 1 is the Wolf Crow Claw, and player 2 threw gold water to him to pass on a message. If that is true, then player 2 is deliberately trying to trick player 1."

"Because this Jinshui is not so easy to deal with, the prophet in the later position will definitely suspect that 1 and 2 may be double wolves. If he goes to check 1 at that time, won't he not even have the chance to activate the skill and will be pushed out of the game?"

"Player No. 6 can say that 1 and 2 might be twin wolves, and even suspects that 1 is Wolf Crow Claw. His perspective is to expose the bandits."

"The other one is what player No. 7 got. As a prophet, No. 6 should focus on talking about No. 5 being the Wolf Crow Claw, because No. 5's speech doesn't seem like he's meeting No. 2."

"As a result, player No. 8 said that this was not a breaking point at all. No prophet would keep predicting that his check was a big wolf when he was on the alert."

"Okay, let's take a step back and say that this is not the breaking point of player No. 6. But he can't even recognize the 4 under the police. Is there something wrong with his logic?"

“警上2号玩家跟4的对话，再加上2、4做不成双狼的位置格局，一定是要聊到4大概率是好人的，但6提到了吗？并没有。”

"Player 6 didn't figure out the logic that should be figured out, but he paid close attention to the logic that shouldn't be figured out. I can't recognize such a prophet."

"I even suspect that player 6 threw a check on player 5 just to gain more strength. After all, most people think player 6 is a wolf and won't throw a check on a good guy who is about to stand on the wrong side. The fact that he threw a check on player 5 means that he is most likely a wolf."

"Perhaps that's what player No. 6 is thinking. So in my opinion, it doesn't matter if player No. 6 throws a check to player No. 5."

“8号玩家疯狂给6打煽动号票，我觉得6、8大概率是双狼，5、6肯定是不共边的，5可以认下。”

"Player No. 3 is on the side of Player 2, and is trying hard to get votes for Player 2. I feel like he doesn't have much of a bandit side, at least today I can't see him being a wolf."

"And player No. 7 must be a good guy. If he and player No. 6 were teammates of the wolf, based on his comments in the first half, he would have rushed in and set the pace a long time ago."

"But then player 7 played 6 again, and the logic was wrong. I think it was a very good play, and I really like it, so 7 must be a good person, even if I'm on the wrong side. 6 is a prophet, so 7 must be a good person."

"If he had a wolf in his hand, he wouldn't have spent half his time figuring out why Player 6 was so powerful."

"Okay, I'll just say this much for the police. The bottom card is a good guy, stand by player 2, 6 and 8 should be double wolves, and there are two more wolves under the police. That's it, it's over."

[Player No. 11 please speak]

"I just like the prophet who throws the check, that's interesting. Gold and water are so boring."

"Just listening to the speech of player No. 5 on the police station, I think there is a side to it, because I don't agree with what he said."

"Taking sides with the police is not just a matter of stating one's position and attitude. That's just the most basic thing. In addition to that, one must also vote for the prophet in one's mind."

"Otherwise, why bother to comment on the prophet? Isn't the fundamental purpose to make the good people in the external position agree with your logic and then stand on your side?"

"Player 3 wants to side with Player 2. He thinks Player 2 is a prophet. In this case, it is normal for him to vote for Player 4 in a conversation with Player 2."

"Anyway, I don't feel there's anything wrong with that. The police are definitely not standing by for show. There's nothing wrong with canvassing for votes for the prophet in your mind."

"Player 5 called 3 a wolf just because 2 voted for 3, and even wanted to turn 3 into a public wolf pit. His behavior and mentality are not good in my opinion."

It seems that Player No. 11 is also on the side of Player 6. From what he said, he wants to stand on the side of the Prophet who loses the kill, or in other words, he is more inclined to the Prophet who loses the kill.

In addition, player No. 5's speech was not good to begin with, and when player No. 6's check was thrown at No. 5, he naturally sat on No. 6's side.

"Just now, player 10 said that there was something wrong with the logic of player 6, and that the police badge flow was also problematic. He shouldn't have played 1 and 2 double wolves."

"I'm just wondering, why can't we play it? Player 2 throws gold water to Player 1. Logically, Player 1 and Player 2 don't meet. Player 1 is a good person, and Player 2 throws gold water to Player 1 to solicit votes."

"But what if player No. 2 takes an unconventional approach and throws gold water to his wolf teammates as an identity? This routine seems to be quite common, right?"

"And from the perspective of player 6, 2 and 5 are two wolves, 3 and 5 don't look like they have met, and he couldn't tell from the speech of player 1 whether he was a wolf or a good guy, so what's wrong with playing in the badge flow?"

“我一点都不觉得6号玩家的警徽流有问题，别说什么验3号玩家，3、5双狼说破大天都是小概率情况，5是狼鸦之爪同样是小概率事件，怎么6号玩家警上就非要上赶子盘3、5双狼，5是狼鸦之爪打错了3吗？完全没道理好吧。”

"It's normal for player No. 6 to recognize 3. It's really eye-opening for him to use his badge flow on 3. At least that's what I think."

"Player No. 3 cannot enter the badge stream. The one after the police can listen to the speech. Player No. 9 under the police has already entered the first badge stream. In this case, is there a better choice than verification 1? Obviously not."

"As for the fact that player No. 6 did not recognize that player No. 4 was a good guy, I find it outrageous. Why did he have to recognize that player No. 4 was a good guy?"

"He didn't see the votes, he didn't hear the speeches, so why did he want to acknowledge Player 4 from afar? Some people would think that Player 4 can be acknowledged directly, but some people would be more cautious, after all, this is a speech listening game."

"So if we don't recognize Player 4, we won't have the perspective of the prophet? What kind of logic is this?"

“更何况警下4、9两个人，他把4号玩家认下来，9会怎么想？他还指望着9给他上票呢。”

"If player 9 votes for 4 because he recognized 2, wouldn't player 6 be at a loss?"

"Having said so much, I just want to tell good people that the so-called 6 logic problems are actually not problems at all."

"But the strength of the No. 6 player in checking and killing the No. 5 player is obvious and no one can deny it."

"Player No. 10 said that 6 is just a test of strength, and 2 and 5 cannot form a double wolf. I heard him speak, and he was fighting 6 the whole time. This is not the mentality of a good person, but more like a werewolf who charges and sets the pace."

"I think 2, 5, and 10 are probably three wolves, and there is a high probability that one wolf is under the police. If the four wolves on the plate are under the police, player No. 12 will have to go into the wolf pit."

“1、3、7我觉得都是好人，就目前的情况来说，还盘不了1、2双狼做身份，但6警徽流打到1身上是绝对没问题的。”

"Similarly, you can't play 5 or 3 pairs of wolves before you are sure that player 5 is the Wolf Crow Claw."

"Although player No. 7 is on the side of player 2, he made a good speech, especially the logic of the strong force of player 6 in the first half of the game. I particularly agree with it. A wolf would not talk about these things."

"So, 1, 3, and 7 have to be put on hold for now. If there are any problems with their conversation, we can consider whether they are wolves then. That's it. We're done."

(End of this chapter)