Werewolf: Please start your show

Chapter 545 You May Have Been Tricked

[Player No. 12 please speak]

"How should I put it? 2 and 8 both seem to have prophetic aspects."

"2 The speech of the prophet in this round is indeed much better than that in the last round. It gives people a brand new feeling. It is no exaggeration to say that he can talk so well because he got the real prophet card."

"Because some people, forget it, I won't talk about some people, just myself, the state and speech of taking the wolf and the prophet are very different."

"Player 2 was a wolf in the last game, but he turned into a prophet. His conversation was not as explosive as a spiral, but it was almost the same. In this game, he was quite like a prophet."

"But then again, if player 8 wants to check and kill, there is no need to check and kill 6. It would be good to check and kill 3. Even if the prophet in the later position verifies that 3 is gold and water, what can he do?"

"3 received both the check and gold water at the same time. The good guys would definitely think that it was the prophet who checked and killed 3, and he was the wolf teammate who jumped out to rescue him."

"In the last game, player 3 took the wolf and immediately gave up struggling after receiving the check. In this game, he took the check and didn't recognize the wolf, which might give the good guys an illusion that player 3 is not the wolf."

"But in reality, his trump card is the wolf."

"I believe the good guys will definitely have such suspicions. As long as 3 is checked and killed, we will be very wary and suspicious of his words. In this case, the knight will most likely poke 3."

"With this poke, Player 8 achieved his goal. The knight was fooled by him and killed himself."

"So, it seems that he is better at checking for player 3 than making up so many mental processes to check for player 6. This is where player 8 is like a prophet, and it is also the reason why players 4 and 5 stand by 8."

"I suddenly realized that in this round, we didn't seem to use logic to decide our sides. Or, speech and logic have become secondary factors. Instead, some off-field factors are driving our decision."

Player No. 12 really hit the nail on the head on this point. Judging from the comments so far, the good guys’ stance is not based on logic, but on being influenced by off-field factors.

But this is understandable. Player No. 8 did not check Gu Feng, which led the good guys to think that his check was a bit strange and unexpected.

It is highly likely that a tough guy would not dare to do such a dangerous thing, after all, it is too easy to fail.

The good people subconsciously thought that the prophet would go to test Gu Feng first, but he didn't do so, so the good people naturally questioned his identity.

As for player No. 2, he just jumped into the role of wolf in the last game, and his speech was not very good, but in this game he jumped into the role of prophet again, and his speech was quite good, at least compared with the last game.

From a human perspective, Player No. 2 knows that it is not good to use the wolf as a tough guy, so he is unlikely to do so. And because he has done so twice in a row with a big difference between the two, it makes people feel that he is not using the wolf as a tough guy in this game.

This is why good people do not take sides based on logic, but instead use some off-field factors to identify prophets.

"My thoughts are similar to 1. I tend to side with player 2 because his comments in the last game and this game are quite different."

"It's difficult for a wolf to make such a big adjustment and change in such a short time. There is only one possibility, that is, his trump card has changed."

"In the last game, he was a wolf who came out to attack. He might have been a little panicked. Moreover, he was forced to throw a check to his wolf teammates due to the situation on the field. He was under a heavy psychological pressure, so it was normal that the conversation was not going well."

"But in this game, he is the prophet. The psychological feeling is different. He speaks with confidence and has a clear perspective. Naturally, what he talks about is different."

"And I think the water of player No. 6 is pretty good. He said that player No. 8 might be afraid that after he throws gold water to player No. 3, the prophet in the later position will throw gold water to player No. 3 again, and then it will be troublesome to make player No. 3 have double gold water."

"Player No. 3's ability to find wolves to stand by is obvious to all. Once he gets two gold waters to lead the team, I'm afraid the knights won't have to come out to poke."

"So, player No. 8 cannot throw gold water to player No. 3. Throwing this gold water may destroy the Wolf team."

"But if he threw a check to player 3, he was afraid that he would hit a wall, or that player 3's performance was very good and he would be pushed out. In this case, he suddenly had an idea. He didn't define the identity of player 3, but instead made up a mental journey. Throwing a check to player 6 seemed much more reasonable."

"Player 2 is the prophet, player 3 is gold and water, and player 6 is the reverse gold. Eliminate them both. Player 1's stance and speech are similar to mine. You can't point out that he is a wolf for now, and you have to recognize him."

“这样一来，警上我能点的坑位就是4、5、8、9、10。”

“9号玩家又是首置位发言比较做好的，如果把他往后放一放，那就是4、5、8、10四个人当中出三狼。”

"If another wolf is found among the police officers 7 and 11, I think 7 and 8 are likely to be double wolves."

"My intuition tells me that Player 8 is using the first badge flow on Player 7 just for the sake of identity."

"Because this is a Knight's board. He knows that he can't hide his identity for long. It can even be said that he will be exposed on the first day. In this case, 8 can't sell a good guy card for nothing."

"Anyway, I'll just point player No. 7 into the wolf pit and put some pressure on him. I'll see how he talks. If he sounds like a good guy, I won't force him to be a wolf."

"Okay, that's all I want to say on the police. I'm a good guy, and I'll stand on the side of Player 2 for now. That's it, it's over."

[Player No. 10 please speak]

"1 and 12 both support player 2. I think differently. I think player 2 is most likely a wolf pretender, and player 8 is the real prophet."

"Player No. 2 has jumped to the prediction position twice in a row. In the last round, he jumped to the wolf position and the conversation was not very good. In this round, he jumped to the prophet position and the conversation was quite good."

"Comparing the two, it really makes people feel that he is a prophet in this game, not a tough wolf."

"But I think this is exactly where the No. 2 player has a trick. Normally, he just jumped with the wolf in the last game, and the result was not satisfactory. He should not jump again with the wolf this time."

"But what if he does the opposite? As long as he comes out to play as a prophet, and as long as he talks better than in the last game, he can win the trust of most good people, because there will definitely be people comparing his speeches in the two previous games when he played as a prophet."

"If there really is no good person who thinks of this, his teammates can jump out and lead the pace. For example, Player 1 can talk about this illogical thing, which immediately raises the level of the prophet No. 2."

"So, player No. 2 might be a werewolf who takes an unconventional approach. The more the good guys think that he won't make another bold move, the more he will make a move. Only when he doesn't follow the rules can he achieve a miraculous effect."

"As for why his comments in this round were much better than in the previous round, it might be because he didn't lose the check this time, nor did he lose the check to his teammates. This made his state very different from the previous game, and he was able to talk better."

"In fact, after Player 1 mentioned this, the good guys will fall into a misunderstanding, that is, they feel that the difference between Player 2's speech as a prophet in the two rounds before and after is related to his trump card. One is a wolf and the other is a prophet, so naturally they will talk differently."

"But in fact, it's not just the trump card that will affect the tough guy's speech, the identity definition given to the external player will also affect his performance."

"I just said that in the last game 2 lost the check and killed the wolf teammate, but in this game he lost the gold water and threw it to the good guy. The mentality must be very different. The mentality is different, and there will be a big difference in the speech."

"In short, the difference between player 2's jump to the prophet before and after may not be caused by the trump card, but may also be caused by the different definitions of the identities of the external players."

"This is a huge misunderstanding. I share this with good people in the hope that they can think seriously about whether this is the truth."

I have to admit that what Player No. 10 said does make some sense.

There are many factors that influence the quality of a person's speech, and this is especially true for fake speeches.

It can be said that the reason why Player 2 played the prophet in this round was better than in the previous round was because his trump card was not the wolf, but it can also be said that he did not lose the check and kill, and did not lose the check and kill to his wolf teammates, so the psychological pressure was not that great, and his speech became better.

Most people only consider the former and never even think about the latter. After all, the trump card has the greatest impact on speech. Other factors can also affect the quality of a person's speech, but relatively speaking, the impact is smaller.

The fact that Player No. 10 could think of this shows that he thought about it carefully. He did not follow the speech and logic of the previous player. This is the highlight of his speech.

Even though he is a wolf, he is also a werewolf who is very good at setting the pace and finding faults. He can always find logical points that sound quite reasonable to attack people.

"I think you all think too badly of player 8 for throwing a check to player 6 instead of first checking 3."

"Is the water of player No. 6 good? I don't think it's good. He said that 8 didn't give 3 a gold water because he was afraid that after 3 received two gold waters, he would turn the water against 8. At that time, 8 would have no defense. In order to avoid this situation, 8 gave 6 a check."

"Then the question is, he didn't throw gold water to player 3 because he was afraid that 3 would turn against him after receiving double gold water. If that's the case, wouldn't it be better for him to throw it directly to player 3?" "We've already experienced how hostile and wary the good guys are to player 3 in the last game. In this game, player 8 can completely take advantage of the good guys' mentality and throw it to player 3 to make them doubt his identity."

"As long as the knight stabs player 3 and kills himself, his mission will be completed, but player 8 didn't do that."

"Player No. 12 said that Player 8 was afraid that Player 3 would throw a check and hit him hard. But forget it. He was determined to die and jumped. Why would he be afraid of hitting a wall? This statement is totally untenable."

"To put it bluntly, he said this in order to justify his own position and logic. Any good person can tell with a little analysis that what he said is wrong."

"So, I don't think Player 8 is a wolf, and I don't think his mental journey of testing Player 6 is made up."

"I want to side with player 8. In my opinion, player 2 is just a tough guy who is trying to gamble with the good guys. He knows very well that if he plays the prophet again, as long as the conversation is better than the last time, the good guys will side with him. His tactics are quite deep, but he still can't fool me."

"I have listened to the police's speech. According to the pattern of the three wolves on the police, I think three wolves will appear among 1, 2, 6, and 12."

"Player 3 should be a good guy because he is on both sides of the plate. I can feel from his comments that he has no hostility towards Player 8."

"If he were a wolf, he would definitely try to make 8 look like a fake villain, or secretly tell the good guys that 8 is a fake wolf."

"But Player 3 didn't have such thoughts and actions, which means that his trump card is not a wolf. Player 2 threw gold water to him purely to win favor."

"Player No. 4 and Player No. 5 both attacked 6, and they both sided with 8, thinking that 8 was unlikely to be a tough wolf. I have accepted both of them for the time being."

“如果没有意外的话，这局也盘不到他们了，毕竟1、2、6、12这四个坑，加上警下的7、11已经够好人忙活的了，没有更多的轮次再盘4、5当中有狼。”

"As for who is the wolf between 7 and 11, it's hard to say for now. Even though player 12 is very hostile to player 7 and it seems that 7 and 12 are not on the same side, I dare not easily recognize player 7."

"After all, the wolves on this board will hook each other, step on each other for identity or something, so the 12th player hitting the 7th does not mean that the 7th and 12th are not on the same side. We still have to listen to his words under the police."

"Okay, that's all I want to say on the police. The bottom card is a good guy. I stand on the side of player No. 8. That's it. It's over."

[The speech for the Sheriff’s election is over, players under the police are invited to start voting]

As soon as player No. 10 passed the microphone, the system's beep sounded.

All of a sudden.

All eyes were on Player 7 and Player 11 who were under the police watch.

The two of them entered the police badge flow of 2 and 8 respectively, and 2 and 8 also have the prophet side, and they also have the logical point of being transformed into wolves.

In this case, if nothing unexpected happens, they should vote according to the police badge flow, one voting for player No. 2 and the other voting for player No. 8.

This way you can pull out a tie PK, and then listen to 2 and 8 talk about it again, which will help the good guys stand on the side.

Ten seconds of consideration passed in a flash.

The ticket shape soon appeared in everyone's sight.

7 chooses to vote for player number 8.

11 chooses to vote for player 2.

As expected, one person, one vote.

From this point, it can be seen that 7 and 11 have quite good understanding of each other and neither of them did anything outrageous.

[Since both parties have the same number of votes, the next step is to enter the PK speech session]

[Player No. 8 please speak]

"I expected the PK comments, but I didn't expect that the one who jumped in with me was actually player 2. This guy is really bold. He was so bad in the last game, but he dared to jump in this game."

"But like Player 10 said, he is just gambling with the good guys' mentality, taking advantage of the so-called human nature. As long as the good guys stand on the side of human nature, they will be fooled."

"Many people on the police force said that I didn't consider the issue comprehensively and carefully. I shouldn't have asked the Knight to stab Player 3. What if Player 3 is a good guy and the Knight kills himself? It will be difficult for the good guy to catch up after falling behind in the round."

"Actually, what I'm thinking is that it doesn't matter even if the knight crashes himself to death. There's still the witch. As long as the witch poisons people according to the wolf pit at 3 o'clock, she will basically be right."

"Add to that my human verification. If it's gold and water, it can clear traps and reduce the werewolf's living space. If it's a kill, it's even better, ensuring that the witch doesn't poison the wrong person."

"Besides, as long as hunters and witches hide well, it will be difficult for werewolves to kill gods. That's why I said it's okay for the knight to stab himself to death."

"Maybe saying this will make the knight feel uncomfortable, as if I don't take his life seriously and don't consider his feelings. I can understand this, it's normal."

"But I'm going for the win, and I won't think too much about the Knight's feelings. I just want him to prove to me that 3 is a good guy and a wolf, and do what he should do. That's enough."

"Even though you guys are beating me up, to be honest, I don't think there's much problem with my idea. You just want the knight to stab you to death. The good guys will definitely lose if they fall behind in the rounds."

"But in reality, as long as the hunter and the witch don't foolishly jump out, the wolf may not win even if it leads in rounds. What's more, the witch can catch up with the rounds."

Player No. 8 was quite stubborn. So many people on the police said that there was something wrong with him talking to the knight to poke Gu Feng, and that it was not a good way to play for the good guys, but he insisted on his own idea.

In his opinion, even if the knight killed himself and there were only three gods left on the field, it would not be so easy for the wolf to kill the gods.

Unless the hunter and the witch jump out on their own, how can the wolf ensure that every strike will be accurate?

The most important thing is that the order cannot be wrong. If they kill the hunter by mistake, it will help the good guys to catch up.

Therefore, if the knight stabbed himself to death, it would only put the good guys in a passive position and would be far from determining the final outcome.

"Both players 4 and 5 tend to side with me. I'll accept them for now. Player 10's speech and logic in standing by me in the last position clearly show that he is a good guy."

"If he is a wolf, then I can only say that he won, because it is impossible for him to be a wolf in this round. If nothing else, his remarks reminding good people of the logical fallacy are simply too good."

"He's absolutely right. Although the statements made by player 2 before and after the prophet's death are very different, this may not be due to the trump card. It may also be related to the information he reported."

"One is to check and kill the wolf teammates and hit them with a board, and the other is to throw gold water to the good guys to solicit votes. These are definitely completely different feelings and mentalities, so it is normal for the speech to change because of this."

“4、5、10我都认下了，9号玩家暂时盘不到，这样一来，警上我能点的就是1、2、3、6、12。”

"From what he said, it seems that Player 3 is not a big bandit, and he is probably not a wolf. If the Knight doesn't poke him, I will go check him out tonight."

"For the first badge flow, I will attack player 3. For the second badge flow, I want to attack player 12. He has a big bandit face because he is following the speech and logic of player 1 to attack me."

"If the test shows that 12 is gold and water, player 1 should be the wolf. If the test shows that 12 is the wolf, I will find all three wolves, which is 2, 6, and 12."

"Unless the fourth wolf on the plate goes on the alert and sends player number 1, otherwise, you can only let 1 go."

"But in reality, I think it's possible that the four wolves are on the police in this situation, so I can't rule out the possibility that 7 and 11 are good guys."

"I checked the No. 11 player. If it is Gold Water, I will consider putting the Wolf on the fourth player. The same applies to the good guy in the external position. It is not necessary to put the Wolf on the fourth player."

"Okay, that's all I have to say for the PK speech. The badge flow is 3, 11 smooth verification, I hope all good people can vote for me for the badge. There is no guard, this badge is very important, that's it, pass."

(End of this chapter)