Werewolf: Please start your show

Chapter 513 The clown is actually me?
[Player No. 9 please speak]

"How should I put it? Both bear trainers had some bad conversations. Player 5 shouldn't have doubted Player 3's identity during the PK. He shouldn't have even competed with Player 3 for the police badge. He should have just given up the badge. That's what a bear trainer should do."

"Player No. 5 said that he was not sure that Player 3 was a good person, and was afraid that Player 3 was a wolf who made good speeches, so he was unwilling to give up the badge. From his point of view, he should try to get the badge if he can."

"I can barely understand his thinking. In the final analysis, he is still obsessed with the police badge. He thinks that bear trainers are just like prophets, who just want to get the police badge. His thinking has not changed yet."

"Of course, this is the best case scenario. On the worst case scenario, maybe player 5 is unwilling to give up the badge to player 3, and he wants to get the badge so that he can return the ticket at the last position."

"This is the problem with the speech of player No. 5, and the speech of player No. 4 was very ordinary. The speech of player No. 3 and No. 5 in the lower part of the warning was indeed a bit too much, so I won't say it exploded."

"3 and 5 definitely can't be double wolves. If this game is really 3 and 5 double wolves, we can only give 3 to win. There is no other way. His speech on the police and in the PK determined that he can't be a wolf."

"It's pointless to go to extremes and arrange 3 or 5 pairs of wolves. It's meaningless for two wolves to act as opponents. Good people simply can't believe this kind of logic. It's purely to bring bad luck to yourself."

"If player 4 is a bear tamer, I can only say that he is too impulsive. Playing 3 and 5 double wolves is a huge failure. Even if 3's butt is a little crooked and very annoying, you can't play 3 and 5 double wolves."

"I am more inclined to side with player 5 now, but my side has nothing to do with what players 4 and 5 say. They don't talk very well, and compared to the two of them, their speeches are not of much value."

"I stand with player No. 5, mainly for team reasons, because I recognize players 3 and 8 as good guys. They both stand with player 5, which makes me feel that player 5's team is cleaner."

"As for player 4's team, let alone player 12 who is almost ready to be killed, I don't believe that there will be no wolves among players 6 and 7."

"From what I've heard from 6 and 7, I feel like it's unlikely that both of them are good people. Whoever is the wolf, he's probably charging, not barbing."

"Especially player 7, he didn't have a good conversation this round. It was obvious that player 4's 3 and 5 wolves were problematic, but he managed to say that 4 was like a bear tamer. In the words of player 8, this is confusing right and wrong."

"The logic of player 6 standing by player 4 is a little far-fetched. The policeman 5 is not very good at chatting, but player 4 is not that strong either. If you want to fight, fight both of them together. It would be bad to favor one over the other."

"In my opinion, the reason why Player 6 wanted to side with Player 4 was mainly because Police Officer 5 suspected that he might be a wolf. To put it bluntly, personal emotions influenced Player 6's judgment."

"Maybe 6 is a good guy who is prone to losing his mind, but it's also possible that player 6 is just going with the flow and charging his wolf teammates."

"4 and 6 can be played together. Who says we can't? Assuming that player 6 is a hidden wolf, even if he thinks player 5 might be a bear tamer, he won't come out to make a bold move. So don't say that player 4 and 6 will definitely make a bold move if player 6 speaks in the front position. There is no certainty. What's more, player 6 is a hidden wolf and it is not easy for him to make a bold move."

Player No. 9 finally chose to stand on the side of Player 5, but his logic and reasons were quite unexpected.

It has nothing to do with the speeches of 4 and 5. According to him, the two of them didn’t talk very well, so there is no point in comparing them. They can only find another way and find a point of entry from their respective teams.

Player No. 5's team is relatively clean, while Player No. 4's team has wolves, and there is more than one, and the possibility of a hook is very small, so the only option is to charge.

Therefore, player No. 9 thinks that player No. 5 should be a bear tamer and player No. 4 should be a tough wolf.

"There are two people under the police, 7 and 10. If 5 stands by his side, he will definitely recognize 10. If he is a wolf, he will never vote for 5. At most, he will vote for 3 and let 3 get the police badge. Player 7 just meets this characteristic."

“警上开三狼，大概率是4、6、12吧，如果6号玩家不是狼，说明1、2、8当中有深水倒钩狼。”

"Player No. 11 can't get the card. Although he is on side 3, which is different from my side, his speech on the police can't pick up the wolf card."

"Because the No. 12 player talked too much like a wolf. He thought that No. 12 standing on the side 4 was a cushioning move, not a charge, so he went to stand on the side 4. This was too much like a good person who was tricked."

"If he was a wolf, he wouldn't talk like this, and wouldn't take sides like this. From my perspective, 11 can only be a good guy on the wrong side. I can't beat him because he's a wolf."

"Player No. 3 can't even guess it, so I said there is a deep-water hook wolf on the police, and it can only be among 1, 2, and 8."

"Player 3 on the police said that Player 4's statement was a bit of a sham, that Player 4 and Player 8 might be twin wolves. It sounds reasonable, but it's actually too far-fetched."

"I think the reason why 4 picked on player 8 is more like to make his own speech more full. After all, player 5 just said that 8 and 9 are good people, so he seemed to be inferior if he followed suit."

"So how can we avoid being short of this? It's very simple, just pick someone to talk to in more detail. He picked player 8. Saying that 8's speech was pretentious doesn't mean to force 8 to be the opposite."

"Of course, this is just my guess, it may not be correct. I just think that player 3's plate 4 and 8 may be double wolves. He is thinking too much."

When it comes to the definition of the relationship between 4 and 8, Player No. 9 and Gu Feng have completely different views.

He felt that Player No. 4's warning point 8 was purely to enrich his own speech, so that it didn't sound like he was following the trend to define the identities of 8 and 9.

Gu Feng's suspicion that 4 and 8 might be a pair of wolves because of this is an over-association.

But then again, until the answer is revealed, who knows who is right and who is wrong?

"If nothing unexpected happens, my vote will most likely go to Player 4. Let's see if his last words can bring me back. That's it. I've passed."

[Player No. 10 please speak]

"Let me first explain why I voted for player 5. I originally wanted to vote for player 3, after all, he has a good identity, but I thought since I stand on the side of player 5, I should vote for him."

"Vote for 3. What if 3 is a wolf? It is true that his speech is good, but doing good does not mean he is a good person. Everyone should understand this principle."

"Unless he clearly reveals his identity, I think it's better to vote for Player 5."

"After all, I'm on Player 5's side and hope he gets the badge. Player 3 wants the badge but doesn't want to take an identity photo. I think there's a certain risk in giving him the badge."

"Although judging from his statement, the possibility that he is a wolf is very low, but wouldn't it be better to just give the badge to the bear trainer who recognized him?"

Listening to the reasons why player No. 10 voted for player 5, Gu Feng frowned, and there were only two words in his mind: far-fetched.

The reason for 10 to directly vote for 5 is too far-fetched. What does it mean that there is a certain risk in voting for him? Does it mean that there is no risk in voting for 5?

They are both risky things, so relatively speaking, it is definitely better to give him a vote.

At least no matter who the bear tamer is, he is a good person and he makes sure the badge is in good hands. But by voting for Player No. 5, can he guarantee that he is not on the wrong side?
Player No. 10's mentality is not right. At least from the reasons he gave for voting for No. 5, it is quite far-fetched.

Either player No. 10 is the wolf and is trying to win the favor of player No. 5 to establish his own identity, or player No. 10 is the wolf and is trying to get votes for his wolf teammates.

These two possibilities are the most reasonable. Pan 10 is a good person and thinks he is on the right side, so he wants to vote for the bear trainer he has recognized. This possibility is very small.

"After all the speeches, some people suspected that I was a wolf trying to get votes for my wolf teammates, while others thought that I was a good person and was not worthy of the wolf card."

"The reason why they have such a big disagreement on my identity is fundamentally because of their stance and side."

"Those who believe that player 5 is a bear tamer will definitely recognize me, and those who side with player 4 will naturally think I am a wolf."

"Stance and side largely determine identity. For example, player 7 stands on the side of player 4 and points me into the wolf pit. Then his identity is not good and he is most likely a wolf."

"For example, player No. 8 is on the side of player No. 5. If he recognizes me, then he should be well-positioned and can temporarily play the good guy."

"I think as long as I'm not on the wrong side, the wolf pit is actually very clear."

"Player No. 7 opened the wolf under the police. From this round of speech, we can hear how crooked his butt is. Oh no, it's not crooked, it's just a lie with open eyes. He can also say that 4 sets of 3 or 5 pairs of wolves are 4 like bear tamers. It's outrageous."

"With three wolves on the alert, player 12 will definitely not be able to escape. At first I thought he was a werewolf that charged forward head-on, but after listening to player 3's PK speech, I realized that I underestimated player 12."

"I'm afraid he's not a headstrong charge, but a wolf who wants to trick good guys into standing by his side."

"Player No. 12 is quite scheming, and I am too naive, but the results seem to be the same. No matter if Player No. 12 is a head-on charge, or Player No. 12 pads the flying wolf and teammates routinely trick the good guys, it is nothing more than a double wolf of Player No. 4 and Player No. 12."

"There may be another wolf between 1 and 2. There must be someone on the wolf team to hook. It is impossible for all of them to rush forward."

"Player No. 11 should be able to recognize it. It is true that he stood on the wrong side, but standing on the wrong side does not mean he is a wolf. Moreover, the logic of his warning to the upper plate that he stood on side 4 is exactly the routine of No. 12 to deceive the good guys."

"The most important thing is that judging from the speeches of 11 and 12, they can't form a double wolf. On the police, 11 stood up and hammered 12 into the ground, leaving no room for maneuver. If 11 and 12 can still form a double wolf, then it can only be said that 11's acting skills are too good." "Having said so much, I also hope that 11 can turn around this round. On the police, you may not have expected that 12 would cushion the flying wolf teammate. After listening to the speech of player No. 3, I think your side should change."

"At least you won't think that player 12 is a bear tamer just because player 4 is a wolf and he stands next to player 4."

There are some differences between the wolf pit chosen by player No. 10 and the one in the front position.

Recognizing player No. 11 who is on the wrong side and attacking player No. 12 as a wolf are both the same, but there is a disagreement on who the final wolf is.

10没有点6号玩家进狼坑，他觉得4、6双狼的可能性不是很大，相对来说，1、2当中找钩子更合理一些。

I'm afraid it's unnecessary for all the wolf team members to charge. With player No. 4 chatting like that, is it worth it for the wolf in the outside position to charge him?

7 showed no mercy to player No. 10 who was under the same police watch as him, and directly pushed him into the wolf pit.

They were suspicious of each other when they were still under the police, and now their positions are completely different. 7 was beating him in the front position like a wolf, so could he still be polite to 7?
"Let's send out player No. 4 today. Although I can't guarantee that I'll be on the right side, based on the current situation, No. 4 is basically a tough jump and can't escape."

"On the first call, he didn't bring up the problem in Player 5's speech. It can be said that he made a mistake. It can be said that he didn't expect it. On the second call, he played 3 and 5 double wolves. Can we still tolerate him?"

"Player 9 said that the speeches of players 4 and 5 were not very good, but even so, there is still a difference. I think player 5 is better than player 4."

"And didn't player No. 9 say that? Judging from their respective teams, player No. 5 is more like a bear tamer. The two wolves, player No. 7 and player No. 12, are on the side of player No. 4, saying that they are all hooks. With player No. 4's comments, how could he allow the wolves to hook him?"

"Anyway, I'm going to play player number 4, so that's it, pass!"

[Player No. 11 please speak]

"Okay, police, I spoke a little too loudly, and it was a bit hasty to stand by player number 4."

"I was on guard and never thought that player No. 12 was a wolf. He deliberately talked about bombing and padding the wolf teammate to trick the good guys into standing by 4."

"Player No. 3 is still the best. His logic is higher than mine and he thinks more than me. I have to admit that."

"But whether 4 and 12 are twin wolves is still up for debate. All I can say is that I can no longer use this logic to hastily side with player No. 4."

"But then again, can player No. 12 perform such high-level operations? He deliberately talked about exposing his teammates and padding the Flying Wolf. I seriously doubt that he is at this level."

"Because his speech didn't give me the feeling that he was very powerful, just average. To say that he could be a cushion was already a high opinion of him. Could it be that the clown was actually me?"

Although player No. 11 agrees with the logic of Gu Feng's PK speech, No. 12 may be a wolf pad and flying wolf teammate, trying to trick the good guys to stand on the side of No. 4, but this only makes sense in theory.

In fact, it is hard to say whether player No. 12 has this level.

He felt that 12 most likely did not have such a deep routine, and that Gu Feng was overthinking it and overestimating 12's level.

If the 12th police officer really spoke up to protect his teammates, then he was extremely embarrassed and was completely bullied.

Now thinking about what the No. 4 player said on the side of the police, he wanted to find a hole in the ground to crawl into.

At that time, he was full of confidence, and felt as if there was light at the end of the tunnel. He felt that he could lead the good people to distinguish who was the bear tamer and who was the wolf.

But after listening to Gu Feng's analysis, he felt that he was still naive and didn't think deeply enough. He might have been tricked by 12.

"Player No. 12, tell me the truth. Are you the bear trainer or the wolf teammate? Tell the truth and I will give you a lenient punishment. If you resist, I will punish you severely. Think about it carefully."

"As long as you tell us who your wolf teammates are, I promise to treat you decently."

"Player 4, I can no longer side with you, but I won't easily side with Player 5 either. Let me think about how to cast this vote."

"Well, how about this? Let's put player number 12 in today. No matter who is the bear tamer between number 4 and number 5, he is in the wolf pit. In this case, it's good to put him in."

"Unless he switches to Hunter, then he can only vote for 4 or 5. Otherwise, I think it would be great to have 12 to help out."

Player No. 11 was chatting and suddenly wanted to play 12. In his opinion, 12 is a wolf, 4 is a bear tamer, or 5 is a bear tamer. After all, 12 cannot get a good guy card, so playing him is the best choice.

The people in the front position were rather rigid, only thinking that today's rounds would be 4 and 5, and they had not thought of changing the rounds to first send out player No. 12, who had the biggest bandit face.

As long as 12 doesn't jump to hunter, there is nothing wrong with releasing 12 today. If he jumps to hunter, then we will see if there are votes for him.

If not, 12 is the hunter, and the police hit him wrongly, so all the logic has to be re-discussed, and the wolf pit can no longer use area 12.

If someone puts the ticket on 12, it means that he is a hunter who jumps, and then the gun will be checked.

"One of the 7 and 10 police officers should be a wolf. If the 5 is a bear trainer, the 7 is likely to be a wolf. On the contrary, if the 4 is a bear trainer, the 10 will have to fall into the wolf pit."

"The possibility that they are both good people is very low. After all, they stand on different sides, have different logics, and are fighting each other. They both think the other is a wolf. It is definitely unreasonable to say that they are both good people."

"But to be honest, what 7 said this time was a bit outrageous. I thought player 3's butt was crooked enough, but I didn't expect 7 to be even worse."

"What do you mean by player 4 playing 3 or 5 pairs of wolves? That's actually where he acts like a bear tamer. If 4 was a wolf, he wouldn't be so angry. Only a real bear tamer would talk like that when he's really pissed off."

"I can't say that it's wrong to think this way, but anyone who thinks this way must be determined to stand on 4's side. Even though I, the police officer, am more willing to believe that 12 is a bear tamer because of 4, I haven't had such an idea."

“7号玩家能聊出4是驯熊师菜盘3、5双狼的，可见他站边4号玩家的心有多坚定。”

"If 4 is a wolf, then 7 can't escape."

"Player 6 is on the side of Player 4. From what he said, it seems that the main reason he is on the side of Player 4 is because he is too hostile to Player 5."

"Police officer 5 jumped into the role of bear tamer, which was not a good definition of 6's identity. 6 felt that 5's mentality and logic were problematic, so he sided with 4, which was understandable."

“我觉得4、6不太能做成双狼，9号玩家非要强掰逻辑盘4、6双狼，这一点不好。”

"I originally wanted to accept player No. 9, but because his definition of the relationship between No. 4 and No. 6 was different from mine, I couldn't accept him anymore. I even felt that he might be trying to set the pace to resist player No. 6."

"Put yourself in his shoes. If player 6 stands on side 4, does that mean that 4 and 6 are wolves? Is there an underlying reason why he stands on side 4? If so, we can't just dismiss him with one blow."

"Player No. 10 made a good comment on this point. He did not follow the trend and played 4 and 6 double wolves. Instead, he had hooks in plates 1 and 2, saying that it is unlikely that all wolves would charge. This is more in line with the actual situation."

"Comparing the speeches of 7 and 10, I think 10 is much better than 7. Through them, I can infer who is the bear tamer and who is the wolf. It seems that I am on the wrong side of the police."

Player No. 11's attitude towards police officers 7 and 10 actually shows his current inclination to stand on one side.

In his opinion, Player No. 7 has the most crooked butt in the whole venue, and is at the level of confusing right and wrong. He has twisted Player No. 4's explosive point into something like a bear tamer. With such a mentality, how can he get the card of a good guy?

Even if a good person has his own side, and because of that side, it is understandable that his butt is a little crooked, but it is really abnormal to be as outrageous as 7.

Since it is problematic to identify him as a good guy, we can only identify him as a wolf. Player 4 and 7 are both wolves, and player 7 is frantically setting the pace and charging for his wolf teammates.

As for player No. 10, he did not follow the trend and picked the double wolves at 4 and 6. Instead, he suspected that there were hooks at 1 and 2, and wrote something similar to his idea.

Therefore, 11 thinks that 10 is most likely a good guy and 7 is most likely a wolf, so his side naturally begins to lean towards player 5.

"Player No. 3, you decide how to return the votes in the last position. My suggestion is to play Player No. 12 first today, if he doesn't jump to Hunter."

"Of course, if it's a 12-jump hunter, then it can only be picked out of 4 or 5. I'll listen to you. I'll pick whoever you say. In a PK, the level of logic and thinking you've shown is indeed higher than mine. It shouldn't be wrong to listen to you."

"Okay, that's all I want to say for this round. Good guy with the bottom card, passed."

(End of this chapter)