Werewolf: Please start your show

Chapter 196 Pufferfish is for fishing enforcement

[Player No. 6 please speak]

“Although I don’t know if there is anyone else who will play the bear card against Player 3, I have decided to stand by Player 3 and not look back regardless of whether there is anyone.”

"Perhaps this decision was a bit hasty. After all, I only listened to the speeches of the third round, and I didn't even listen to the speeches of the people who jumped against him. It is not a wise choice to rashly stand on the side."

"But I know that my heart has completely leaned towards player 3. I don't want to hide this. I don't want to pretend to play two-sided. From now on, I will only play one-sided."

"As for why I am so determined to side with Player 3, it's simple. I don't think a wolf can come up with his relaxed and humorous way of speaking."

"If, I mean if Player 3 is really a tough wolf, then I admit defeat. I am the legendary fifth wolf."

"But I trust my own judgment and believe that Player 3 is not a wolf."

Player No. 6's statement made all the good people on the field frown.

It is not surprising that he said he would stand on the side of player No. 3. After all, everyone tends to stand on the side of No. 3 now. The key is that he said it directly, leaving no way out.

I would rather be the fifth wolf than think that player No. 3 is a tough guy and stick to one path until the end.

6 It was really a bit unexpected for everyone to say such words.

Too radical.

Anyway, this is only the first round of speeches. You can take sides, but there is no need to be so hasty to tie yourself to player No. 3, right?

To put it bluntly, if players 2 and 4 both perform well, or even player 3 explodes, won’t player 6 feel embarrassed?

For a moment, everyone was wondering what 6's purpose was in talking like this.

Barb?

Flying pad?

charge?

Or a stubborn good guy?
It seems that any possibility is possible, but no matter which one it is, Player 6's behavior is not right.

Good guys always take a cautious attitude when standing on their side and cannot be too blindly radical.

But player No. 6 made all the mistakes, which makes people suspicious.

"Player No. 5 is Zihu, there should be no doubt about that. I don't think Wolf would dare to betray Zihu, right? It's not worth it just to grab a police badge."

“3号玩家是熊，2、4当中至少开一狼，不排除2、4双狼的可能性。”

"Based on the comments so far, it's clear that player 4 is more of a gangster. Although he didn't say he wouldn't side with player 3, I can tell that he's somewhat resistant to player 3 and is hostile to him."

"This is not normal. Logically speaking, after listening to the speech of the 3-jumping bear, a good person should not completely side with player 3 like me, but at least stand with player 5 for the time being like player 3, right?"

"But 4 has been avoiding the main point, not attacking player 2 or 3, and just saying that there is a wolf between 2 and 3, and wants to listen to further speeches. I don't think this is the mentality of a good person."

"If he is a good guy, he will definitely be very hostile to player 2. Even if he doesn't kill player 2 directly, he should at least talk about player 2's explosive points. After all, player 3 is really bad."

"But Player 4 never had such thoughts or actions from the beginning to the end. He kept talking to us in a foggy way, and instead had considerable doubts about Player 3."

"To be honest, I labeled him a wolf as soon as he finished talking. Unless he can prove his identity, I won't believe him even if he says he is a white cat or a pufferfish."

It can be heard that player No. 6 is very hostile to No. 4.

Although he didn't say that player number 4 is definitely a wolf, it's almost the same. He has to wait for player number 4 to flip over before he can believe that player number 4 is a good guy. What's the difference between that and beating him to death?

But think about it, it is normal for Player No. 6 to say such a thing. He has already determined that Player No. 3 is a bear. In this case, how can Player No. 3, who has some doubts and wariness towards Player No. 4, not be beaten?
With his style of speaking in a decisive manner without leaving any room for maneuver, it seemed that he was being let off by not killing player No. 4.

"Player 4 is the wolf, but player 2 can't be let go directly. Maybe 2 and 4 are both wolves. Although this possibility is relatively small, we still have to play it."

"Of course, I didn't want to set the pace and play against the 2nd and 4th wolves. I said that player 2 can't be released because I'm afraid that after the good guys see that 4 is a wolf, they will subconsciously recognize 2 as the wolf. This is not okay."

"Player No. 2 can only be said to have an identity preference. There is a high probability that he is a good person. It is just a high probability, not a certainty."

"Player No. 12 can be put on hold for a bit. He didn't slack off in his first-place comments and even talked about some useful things. His mentality and state of mind are both positive."

"Player No. 1 under the police, how should I put it? He is a wolf, which is not justified. After all, he has made great contributions by staying under the police."

"But it's a bit too hasty to just recognize him. It's not appropriate to say he's a good person without even listening to his speech."

Listening to the speech of Player No. 6, Gu Feng couldn't help but curl his lips.

Now you know that it is inappropriate to recognize the No. 1 player without even listening to his speech? Why don't you think that it is also inappropriate to kill the side without even listening to the speech of the person who jumped the bear in the back position?

Isn’t this typical double standard?
He hasn't even pulled up his pants, but he turns around and calls someone a shit. That's a bit shameless.

This is what people mean. Whatever they say is reasonable.

Player No. 6’s remarks and actions are undoubtedly very inappropriate, but it is hard to say whether he is a wolf or not.

Wolves have double standards, but good people don't? Good people do the same, so now we can only say that the 6th bandit is relatively large, and we can't kill him with one stick.

"Alright, that's all I have to say for now. No matter what you think of me, it doesn't matter. I will always stand on the side of 3 unless he blows himself up. Otherwise, my side will not change. That's it. Over."

[Player No. 7 please speak]

"You are either a wolf or a god, Player 6. This is how I define you."

"In fact, you know that it's not a good idea to talk like this. You know it's impossible but still do it. A commoner wouldn't be so stubborn. Only gods or wolves with a purpose would do this."

"If you are a god, you can't be a white cat. A white cat will never be as high-profile as you. In my opinion, you can only be a pufferfish, not afraid of being pushed back. I even suspect that you are deliberately talking more explosively to lure the wolf to join you."

"If you are a pufferfish, then just pretend I didn't say anything. But if you are not a pufferfish, then I can only say that you are a wolf. As for whether you are a hook charge or a cushion, I can't tell now. I still need to listen to your speech again."

Gu Feng insisted that player No. 6 was either a wolf or a god, and if it was a god, it could only be a pufferfish.

Once this kind of statement comes out, it will be difficult for people in the external position to figure out that he is a pufferfish.

And this is the effect that Gu Feng wants and the goal he wants to achieve.

Because if he wants to trick the wolf into coming to him, the first step is to make the wolf believe that he is not a puffer fish, otherwise the wolf will not take the bait easily.

After all, no one is a fool, and the wolves also know that the pufferfish will find ways to fish. In this case, they must be extra careful not to fall into the pufferfish's trap.

Gu Feng forced player No. 6 to wear puffer fish clothes, and he had good reasons for his actions. This way, regardless of whether No. 6 was a puffer fish or not, the wolves' vigilance against him would be reduced a lot.

To be honest, after player No. 5 jumped to the fox, Gu Feng was praying that player No. 6 would jump to the bear. If that happened, it would be much easier for him to operate.

Unfortunately, Player No. 6 did not let him get what he wanted.

"If I were to stand on the side, I would definitely lean towards player 3. He's the only one jumping the bear now anyway."

"But I have a feeling that the Wolves will not back down. They will definitely make a bold move, but this move may not be to resist the push of Player 3. It is very likely to be for identity purposes."

"For example, if there are two wolves, 8 and 9, and player 8 jumps to a bear, then the good guy standing on the opposite side will easily recognize player 9, which is equivalent to a wolf stepping on a wolf."

"So, I remind you, not all the people around the wolf who pretends to be a wolf are good people. Maybe they are all wolves. Three wolves are punished together, and the wolf in the middle dies and pretends to be a wolf. He deliberately makes things worse and is pushed out. This kind of routine does exist." "Of course, whether it is a wolf stepping on another wolf to gain an identity, or three wolves are punished together to play a routine, these are all low-probability events. If we look at the logic, the good people on both sides of the wolf who pretends to be a wolf can still be recognized temporarily."

As soon as Gu Feng said this, all the good people frowned.

Some people think that he is a good thinker and gave a reminder to good people that this kind of routine does exist.

But some people think that Gu Feng is stirring up trouble and making the situation more complicated.

And the way he talked might be to lay the groundwork for resisting the good people around the tough wolf in the future.

The former is to think positively of Gu Feng's speech, while the latter is to think negatively of Gu Feng's speech.

These are two completely different ideas, and it is hard to say which one is right or wrong. The logic is always consistent. It just depends on whose judgment is more in line with the facts.

Gu Feng himself hoped that the wolf could come out to set the pace, and identify him as the wolf, making him the target of resistance.

If everyone says he is a good person, then how can he still resist the criticism?
There must be something wrong with the speech, but the problem cannot be too obvious, so as not to make the wolf feel that it is intentional to make the talk explode. It is really difficult to find the right balance.

"One of the players 2 and 4 is a wolf. I don't think player 4 is necessarily a wolf. You guys beat player 4 too hard."

"His speech was a bit strange and didn't sound very good, but I think it was out of the caution of a good person."

"It's normal for player 4 to be hostile to player 3. Don't we all think that player 2 made a good statement and is most likely a good person?"

"Similarly, player 4 thinks so too, but he can see clearly that his trump card is not a wolf, and player 2 seems more like a good guy. Would he dare to side with player 3 easily? Would he not be suspicious of player 3 and make a comment?"

"You think that 4's attitude towards 3 is like a wolf, but I think it's the opposite. I think 4's reaction is normal. If he directly recognizes player 3 to fight 2, that's called a guilty conscience."

Gu Feng's remarks once again made the good guy in the external position frown.

It's really unspeakable.

Now almost everyone thinks that 4 is a wolf, but Gu Feng uses logic to say that 4's reaction is normal and that he should not be beaten to death with one stick. This is a bit too bold.

4 and 7 may be twin wolves, which is the thought that comes to most people’s minds.

As for what Gu Feng said about player No. 4’s reaction being normal, there might be some truth to that, but it’s not enough to change the good guy’s mind.

Taking Feng's logic into consideration, 4's reaction is normal, so we have to say that player 2 is a wolf? Or if 2 and 4 are both good guys, and player 3 is a tough guy, this is obviously unreasonable.

"I know that if I talk like this, you will all think that I am making excuses. I am trying to get player No. 4. You will think that 4 and 7 are wolves, but I don't know player No. 4."

"I am just looking at the issue from an objective perspective. 4's comments are not as bad as you think. Maybe he is really a wolf, but you use his strange comments to criticize him. I cannot agree with that."

"Listen to what his subordinates have to say. Player 4 is indeed more of a bandit than Player 2, but who is the wolf between 2 and 4 is still up for debate."

"Player 2, don't be hostile to me just because I helped Player 4. I must be a good guy. If I were teammates with Player 4, I would not help him in this situation."

"Because it's unnecessary. The risk is too great. There's a very high chance that I won't be able to save him and I'll get myself into trouble. Since I dare to stand up and say a few words for him, whether you want to believe it or not, I can't be 4's teammate with the Wolf."

"As for Player 1 and Player 12, you can accept them for now. Anyway, I will follow the logic of the four wolves and the police and point the wolf pit."

"Unless the policeman's No. 1 player talks to me like a wolf, I won't play him."

"Finally, Player 3's speech was good, and his way of chatting was somewhat novel and made people feel good about him, but he might not be a bad guy. Don't be blinded by appearances."

"Whether Player 3 is a bad player or not, we should still leave some room for him to guess and not speak too much like Player 6 did."

"Okay, that's all I have to say for now. For now, I'm on the side of player 3. I'll pick a wolf among players 2 and 4. Player 4 has a bigger bandit face, but I won't kill him. Players 1 and 12 have a preference for their identities. Player 6 is either a wolf or a god. That's it. We've passed."

[Player No. 8 please speak]

"I can tell that player 7 is a wolf. He is helping player 4 and even questioning the identity of player 3. He deserves death."

"At first glance, it sounds like 7 is always thinking carefully about logic, and his words and conclusions all make sense. But if you think about it carefully, you'll find that his logic is very different or ingenious."

"Most people think that player 4 is a wolf, but it is normal for him to insist on playing player 4. We can't just condemn player 4. There is a saying that goes, 'take it slow and take it slow.'"

"When he was on police duty, he said he couldn't kill player 4 with one blow. I'm afraid that when he gets off police duty, he will recognize player 4 as a good guy and start to beat player 2 with his rhythm."

"Why doesn't he attack 2 now? It's not that he doesn't want to attack, but it's hard for him to attack because he can't find a point to attack 2's speech."

"And he couldn't be too obvious in trying to get the No. 4 player. He had to do it slowly and gradually mislead the good guys."

"Player No. 7 is very insidious and cunning."

Player No. 8 stood up and pinned Gu Feng to the ground and hammered him. In his opinion, 4 and 7 were two wolves.

Otherwise, why would Gu Feng be unwilling to beat player No. 4, and why had to raise No. 4 openly or secretly?
Are all the good people wrong and only he is right?
Everyone is drunk but I am sober. Player No. 8 hates this kind of self-righteous people the most.

In fact, the speeches of Gu Feng and Player No. 4 are essentially the same.

He clearly has some ulterior motive in his heart, but he hides it, which makes him seem hypocritical. He says one thing but thinks another behind the scenes.

"Player No. 7, do you know what your biggest point is? It's not that you openly or covertly questioned the identity of Player No. 3 and tried to get Player No. 4, but your definition of the identity of Player No. 6."

"Since you have thought that 6 might be a pufferfish trying to lure the werewolf into taking advantage of the situation, you should just know it in your heart. Why do you have to say it out loud?"

"What good will it do for the good guys if you talk like this? Do you want to show off that you are so powerful and saw through Player 6's plan at a glance?"

"I don't think you're the kind of person who can't hide things, right? If you were really a good person, you would pretend not to know that 6 is a pufferfish, and even secretly cooperate with player 6 to lure the werewolf to get rid of him. This is what a good person should do."

"And you chose to expose player No. 6 directly, saying that No. 6 can only be a pufferfish. Judging from your mentality, it is obvious that you are afraid that your teammates will vote for player No. 6. You are reminding them not to be fooled, right?"

Listening to the speech of player No. 8, Gu Feng was not angry but very happy.

Well played!
He just wanted to make his identity a little worse. Only in this way could he lower the wolves' vigilance against him and allow them to boldly treat him as a target that they could resist.

Player No. 8 followed his words and said that 6 was a pufferfish, and his attempt to bait the law enforcement was exposed. This was exactly the effect Gu Feng wanted.

Moreover, 8 also said something about cooperating with the pufferfish. The more Gu Feng thought about it, the more intriguing it became.

He even wondered if 8 had realized that he was a puffer fish and was covering for him.

I don’t know if he was overthinking it, or if 8 just had such a high level of logic and operation.

"Although I'm not as stubborn as Player 6, it's still very difficult for me to turn back."

"To be honest, as soon as 3 Jump Bear's statement came out, I didn't want to think of him as a wolf anymore."

"If only one wolf appears between 2 and 4, it is obviously player 4. As long as he can't reveal his identity, he will definitely not be able to defeat player 2. There is no doubt about that."

"I won't say anything about player No. 6. No matter if he is a wolf or a god, he can't be dealt with for the time being. Moreover, from the words of player No. 7, I can also hear that No. 6 and No. 7 don't meet."

"Since I have called player 7 a wolf, I have to let player 6 go. It doesn't matter whether he is a god or a commoner."

"You can accept 1 and 12 for now. As long as the conversation between the two of them is not particularly bad, there is no need to click into the wolf pit."

"Okay, that's all I have to say on the police. Stand by player No. 3. There's a high probability that he won't turn back. In my opinion, No. 4 and No. 7 are two wolves. Let's go with player No. 4 today. That's it. We've passed."

(End of this chapter)